What Do Investors Ask
Managers Privately?
Posted by Eugene F. Soltes and Jihwon Park
(Harvard Business School), on Monday, January 15, 2018
Editor’s Note:
Eugene Soltes is the Jakurski Family Associate Professor of
Business Administration and Jihwon
Park is a doctoral candidate at the Harvard Business School.
This post is based on their recent
paper. |
Investors and managers of publicly traded firms
spend a considerable amount of time speaking privately. According to the
consultancy Ipreo, the average publicly traded firm conducts more than 100
one-on-one meetings annually with investors. While growing body of research
provides evidence that these offline interactions offer investors in attendance
opportunities to make more informed trading decisions. what actually goes on
during these interactions has largely been elusive to outsiders.
In this
paper, we seek to better understand the content of private
manager-investor interactions by exploring over 1,200 questions posed
by investors during private meetings with firm managers from two
publicly traded firms. We acquired access to this unique field data by
embedding a confederate with extensive investor relations experience
in two firms from 2015 to 2016.
Working with investor
relations officers (IROs), we devised a classification system for the questions
posed by investors and found that they can be categorized into five distinct
groups. The first type seeks more detailed insight and clarity of information
that is already publicly available. For example, for the biotechnology firm in
our sample, one investor asked if the final product would be manufactured in the
same facility as the product used in regulatory trials. Other types include
questions inquiring about management philosophy (e.g. “What keeps you up at
night?”), questions seeking public information more efficiently (e.g. “Can you
tell me about the level of share ownership by senior management?”), and
questions seeking managers’ feedback on proprietary ideas and investment theses
(e.g. “What looks more attractive right now: M&A activity or share buybacks?”).
Finally, the fifth type
of questions are those seeking more timely information from managers. These are
questions where the investor seeks data or information that is more recent than
that available from public sources. For instance, one question that we observe
investors frequently asking is around current cash holdings. Notably,
the investor is not seeking the figure publicly disclosed in the 10-Q a month
prior to the meeting. Rather, they are seeking to acquire an update of the
financial statement information as of the date of the meeting.
We examine whether the
types of questions asked by investors are predictable based on the personal
background of the investor, their shareholdings in the firm, the characteristics
of the fund they work for, and the venue where the offline interaction took
place. Broadly, we find that in numerous instances the type and frequency of
questions are strongly associated with several of these characteristics. In
particular, investors who are more experienced and meet with managers of the
firm more often are more likely to ask timely questions. Moreover, investors who
hold a position in the firm, work for larger funds, and meet more often are less
likely to ask efficiency questions that are readily answered by referring to
public data sources.
We have data on the
venues of meetings (i.e. conference, roadshow, or private phone call) and find
that investors who gain access to management during a roadshow or private call
ask the most questions. However, the greater number of questions asked during
roadshows tends to be driven by the fact that the duration of the interactions
is longer on average for roadshows. When the duration of the interaction is
taken into account, conference meetings and private calls tend to be the most
efficient meetings in terms of the number of questions asked. Management
philosophy questions (e.g. “What keeps you up at night?”) potentially convey
direct informational benefits, but also offer insight into managers via their
body language and expression. We find that investors tend to less frequently ask
such philosophical questions during private calls as compared to physical
in-person interactions.
We also examine the
differences in the types of questions asked publicly (during conference calls)
to those asked privately during offline meetings. We find that the vast majority
of questions on public conference calls are questions seeking greater detail,
and we find no examples of timely or efficiency questions being asked. We also
find that the number of dialogues is similar between public and private
meetings, but the lack of superfluous pleasantries tend to mean that there is
more interaction in private settings.
Prior research on
private meetings has examined whether offline interactions are associated with
changes in trading of the firm’s security. We further expand this analysis by
examining whether such trading around private meetings is predominately
associated with certain kinds of meetings based on the types of questions asked
by investors. We find that aggregate trading in a firm’s security is higher when
more forward looking questions are asked. Moreover, we find that when investors
ask more forward looking or negative questions during private interactions, they
are more likely to increase or decrease their position in the firm over the
quarter. While this analysis is subject to a number of caveats associated with
our ability to measures changes in ownership surrounding meetings, this
preliminary evidence suggests certain kinds of interactions between managers and
investors are more likely to generate the kinds of “benefits” associated with
private meetings that has been documented in the prior literature.
Overall, our analysis
begins to illuminate the confidential interactions between managers and
investors. The fact that our sample firms would allow us to record these
interactions suggests that they believed they conservatively approached these
interactions with investors. Nonetheless, the nature of some of the questions—in
particular those related to acquiring more timely information—and managers’
potential willingness to respond shows the difficulty in easily classifying what
is viewed as permitted under Reg FD.
The complete paper is
available
here.
Harvard Law School Forum
on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
All copyright and trademarks in content on this site are owned by
their respective owners. Other content © 2018 The President and
Fellows of Harvard College. |