In a climactic day for one of the government's longest
investigations of corporate wrongdoing, federal prosecutors indicted
Sanjay Kumar, the former chief executive of Computer Associates
International Inc., saying he helped orchestrate a widespread
accounting fraud at the company and then lied to cover it up.
The indictment came as CA, one of the country's largest
software makers, was also charged with obstruction and securities fraud
but avoided an indictment after reaching a deferred-prosecution
arrangement with the Justice Department.
Mr. Kumar was named, along with former head of sales
Stephen Richards, in a 10-count indictment yesterday. Both men face
charges including securities fraud and obstruction. They are scheduled
to be arraigned today in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, N.Y. CA shares
fell 38 cents, or 1.48%, to $25.30 in 4 p.m. New York Stock Exchange
composite trading yesterday.
CA, which specializes in back-office software for the
computer infrastructures of big corporations, was once one of high
technology's hottest success stories, and Mr. Kumar was one of its
brightest stars. Then longstanding suspicions of accounting
irregularities gelled into a government investigation that began in
early 2002 and focused on the backdating of contracts to meet financial
projections. Mr. Kumar had worked his way up from software writer to
lead the company, and as recently as this spring, remained at the helm,
pledging that he was cleaning house and reforming internal governance.
Unlike other recent cases in which the government
charged corporate chieftains with countenancing, or hiding, frauds, the
indictment against Mr. Kumar said that he had himself engaged in
backdating -- flying to Paris after the end of a quarter to close a
whirlwind deal with a reluctant customer; the deal was then credited to
the prior quarter. It also said he promised to reward a sales rep who
helped land a crookedly booked deal with a shopping spree.
Under the agreement between the company and the
government, charges will be dismissed if CA successfully completes an
18-month monitoring period. The company will also pay $225 million in
restitution to shareholders who lost money investing in the company. CA
at the same time settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
which had jointly conducted the probe with the Justice Department.
During a busy day in the Brooklyn courtroom of Judge I.
Leo Glasser, CA's former general counsel Steven Woghin pleaded guilty to
charges of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and obstruction of
justice. He also admitted that he coached employees on how to answer
questions to deceive investigators, saying Mr. Kumar instructed him to
do so. In addition, he admitted to drafting a backdated contract -- with
a Dec. 31, 1999, date -- in early January of that year. He is
cooperating as part of his plea deal and probably will be a key witness
against Mr. Kumar.
Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Comey, along with
Roslynn R. Mauskopf, the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, unveiled the
indictments of Messrs. Kumar and Richards. While noting that the
investigation was continuing, Mr. Comey wouldn't comment on who else
might be targets.
But a senior Justice official familiar with the
continuing investigation said one of those still under investigation is
former CEO and founder Charles Wang. He hasn't been charged with any
wrongdoing. His lawyer, Richard Lawler, declined to comment.
Prosecutors are well-stocked with potential witnesses
in the continuing probe and any future trials. The government has
secured guilty pleas from five former executives, including Mr. Woghin
and former Chief Financial Officer Ira Zar, all of whom have agreed to
cooperate.
Mr. Kumar "denies any wrongdoing and expects to be
exonerated of all charges," said a statement from his lawyer, Jack
Cooney. The former chief executive cooperated vigorously with
investigators, Mr. Cooney said, asserting that he recommended inquiries
by two outside law firms, "insisted that all documents be made
available, that all employees cooperate" and that he "fired those that
did not."
Mr. Richards's lawyer, David Zornow, said in a
statement that his client "was not responsible for the finance and sales
accounting functions that determined when revenue was recognized, ...
vigorously denies any wrongdoing and is confident he will be vindicated
at trial."
In their indictment, prosecutors say Mr. Kumar himself
signed one of the backdated contracts, flying on the company jet from an
airfield in Farmingdale, N.Y., near CA's Islandia headquarters, to Paris
to do so. The contract, valued at $32 million, bore a June 30, 1999,
date, even though it was "finalized" around July 8, prosecutors said.
Mr. Kumar then bragged how "his Paris caper had saved the quarter" for
the company, Mr. Comey said at a news conference.
|
CNBC DOW JONES BUSINESS VIDEO
Computer
Associates CEO Kenneth Cron says the company is
"partnering with the government" to bring charges against
some individuals.
|
|
Windows Media Player Required:
HIGH bandwidth4 |
LOW bandwidth5 |
|
|
|
|
|
That contract was trifling compared with others that
were backdated, according to prosecutors, in an increasingly desperate
attempt to meet financial projections that the company was routinely
missing. In early October 1999, the indictment charges that CA backdated
a $102 million contract to Sept. 30. In early January 2000, Mr. Kumar
negotiated a $300 million contract, prosecutors say, though it bore an
"effective date" of Dec. 31. He signed it, they charge, without an
execution date.
The indictment also includes snippets from an e-mail
exchange that implied that Mr. Kumar had direct knowledge of another
questionable deal, involving a contract improperly booked in the quarter
that ended March 31, 2000. Six days after the quarter ended, on April 6,
the indictment says, someone identified only as "Sales Executive #3"
sent Messrs. Kumar and Richards an e-mail about negotiations with a
customer who was refusing to backdate a contract.
The e-mail allegedly discussed getting the customer to
"sign the contract, leaving the date blank," noting that the customer
couldn't "backdate" the contract because it was a new company that
wasn't technically formed until April 1, 2000.
On April 7, Sales Executive #3 sent Messrs. Kumar and
Richards another e-mail celebrating the end of successful negotiations
with that customer, saying in part: "I'm taking my kids shopping
tomorrow -- on you!" Mr. Kumar replied: "Mr. B. Shopping is on me." The
indictment also says Mr. Richards instructed Sales Executive #3 to write
in a March 31, 2000, date on the contract and fax it to CA's
headquarters.
Prosecutors allege that Mr. Kumar deceived the
company's own lawyers in early 2002, shortly after the government probe
began, and lied to lawyers hired by the board at least four times from
October 2003 to April 2004. In one of those interviews, the indictment
charges, Mr. Kumar "falsely stated that he had never monitored
end-of-quarter contracting activity to determine whether CA would meet
analyst earnings estimates."
In court Wednesday, the outside lawyer who headed the
board's internal probe, Robert J. Giuffra Jr., told Judge Glasser that
CA's board "deeply regrets what has happened." While he said CA accepts
responsibility, he also pointed to former executives who had "betrayed"
the board. The deferred prosecution, Mr. Giuffra said, "recognizes that
CA is a company worth saving."
Mr. Woghin, CA's former general counsel and himself a
former federal prosecutor, quietly read a prepared statement. "I am
ashamed to be standing here today," he said, his voice breaking. "It is
entirely inconsistent with my behavior throughout my more than 30-year
legal career."
CA has restated about $2.2 billion of revenue as
wrongly booked, though the company has said it found no evidence of
phony sales. The SEC said yesterday that the figure was more than $3.3
billion in an expanded time frame. Chairman Lewis Ranieri said the
agreement "represents a critical step in closing a deeply troubling
chapter in our company's history."
CA also pledged to help retrieve compensation paid to
former executives involved in wrongdoing -- pay that has outraged many
shareholders. Top CA executives received performance-based bonuses
calculated partly on the false financial figures. And critics have
previously alleged the company inflated revenue to trigger a mammoth
stock award of more than $1 billion that went to Messrs. Kumar and Wang,
and co-founder and current director Russell Artzt.
In its complaint, the SEC for the first time lent solid
weight to that charge, saying that CA's improper accounting started as
far back as the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. In the first quarter of
fiscal 1999, the SEC alleged, 15% of the company's revenue was
improperly recorded. It was during that quarter -- in May 1998 -- that
the giant stock award was made. The men later returned a portion of it
to settle a shareholder suit.
Mr. Comey, the deputy attorney general, said the
deferred prosecution was a precedent of sorts for the department's
three-year-old corporate-fraud task force. The question in such cases is
whether the company can be rehabilitated or has to be "put down" because
the criminal wrongdoing is so pervasive, Mr. Comey said.
The deferred-prosecution agreement lays out a laundry
list of conditions. CA must appoint an independent monitor who will
examine revenue-recognition practices, accounting controls and various
ethics and compliance matters. The prosecution will be deferred for 18
months from the date of the monitor's appointment, presuming CA meets
its obligations. Prosecutors and the SEC can extend the term if they
feel reforms haven't been properly implemented -- or if the monitor
reports problems. CA also agreed to add two new independent directors to
its board, and make other, smaller changes.
The $225 million restitution fund that will be paid to
aggrieved shareholders comes in addition to 5.7 million shares that CA
agreed in August 2003 to issue to settle shareholder suits. Those shares
are valued at about $144 million based on CA's closing price Wednesday.
CA also said yesterday that it expects to name a new
CEO in about 30 days. Board member Kenneth Cron has assumed the role on
an interim basis.
--David Armstrong and Joann S. Lublin contributed to this article.
|
URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109586485897124888,00.html
|
|
Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1)
http://news.findlaw.com/wsj/docs/ca/uskumar904ind.pdf
(2)
http://news.findlaw.com/wsj/docs/ca/usca904defpagr.pdf
(3)
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109588116944325136,00.html?mod=technology_main_whats_news
(4)
http://release.theplatform.com/content.select?pid=enX6s5mNfzW1qLTAje52IMjJeeAg5l8T&UserName=Unknown
(5)
http://release.theplatform.com/content.select?pid=MeC4mz336dVfRcnBU8EM1shuLyvWry13&UserName=Unknown
(6)
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109580497578224106,00.html
(7)
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109563268302721811,00.html
(8)
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109344876416600831,00.html
(9)
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109052171869271249,00.html
|