newsday.com/business/ny-bzca1005,0,1254002.story
Sam Wyly makes new accusations against CA board
BY
MARK HARRINGTON | mark.harrington@newsday.com
5:46 PM EDT, October 4, 2007
Amid
intensified legal arguments over who may or may not have authority to pursue
financial claims against CA founder Charles Wang and others, Texas tycoon
Sam Wyly in a recent court filing alleged a new litany of improprieties by
CA board members.
Lawyers for Wyly in an Aug. 30 filing claimed "new evidence" not yet in its
possession "will implicate CA's board in the fraud and cover-up." The filing
mentions an Oct. 20 meeting at 21 Club in Manhattan in which a top CA
executive, now serving jail time, was allegedly told to "misrepresent the
truth" to federal investigators, by a board member. A CA spokesman, noting
that a federal judge has denied Wyly's court motions, said, "We interpret
that as saying the allegations do not have any merit." Wyly's lawyers have
filed a notice of appeal, and the new allegations are expected to play a
role in the appeal.
Notable among the claims is that former CA chairman Wang "indirectly paid"
board member Alfonse D'Amato through a charitable organization "funded by
Wang" while civil litigation over the $2.2 billion accounting scandal at CA
was pending. Both were on CA's board at the time.
While the court filings don't name the organization, federal tax filings for
the nonprofit, The Smile Train, show that D'Amato's firm, Park Strategies,
was paid a total of $270,000 in fees for "strategic planning" and public
relations between June 1999 and July 2003. Park Strategies, which did
consulting work for CA after D'Amato left the U.S. Senate in 1999, ended the
CA consulting relationship when D'Amato joined the CA board later in 1999.
The Web site for Smile Train, which provides surgery to repair the cleft
palate and lips of children primarily in third-world countries, indicates
that "all non-program expenses" of the organization are paid for by its
board members. In most years, only a handful of outside firms have been paid
by the organization.
A spokesman for Wang declined to provide a comment. D'Amato was traveling
and his spokeswoman didn't return a phone call. The spokesman for CA, which
previously had been a highly visible supporter of Smile Train, declined to
comment on the transactions.
A long-time CA observer said the some of the claims were troubling.
"The new reports about transactions with Mr. D'Amato raise very serious
questions about the entire board's conduct and certainly need to be
investigated," said investment banker Gary Lutin, who has conducted a CA
shareholders forum. "Even if everything can be explained away, you have to
ask why these things weren't addressed in the Special Litigation Committee's
report or by the court-appointed examiner."
Wang has never been criminally charged in the CA case, but a special
committee of CA's board in April issued a scathing report alleging his
involvement in the fraud and cover-up, and CA has reported its intentions to
pursue claims against him. Wang has refuted the charges as "fallacious."
Whether CA will ever get to pursue those claims, and what it says could be
up to $500 million in ill-gotten gains, could be decided soon by a federal
judge.
For several years, Wyly has alleged a 2003 shareholder settlement that
prevented past and current CA officials from being sued for the accounting
fraud was itself arrived at through a fraud on the court that approved it.
Wyly has sought to invalidate the portion of the settlement that released
the executives from legal liability in the case. For years, CA has disputed
Wyly's claims.
But after Wang and former chief financial officer Peter Schwartz declined to
settle past claims with the board's special litigation committee, the
company found it too needed to invalidate some of the settlement releases to
pursue claims against the two. (A lawyer for Schwartz also has maintained
his innocence.) Federal Judge Thomas Platt, who this summer denied Wyly's
request to void the releases, in September also denied the special
litigation committee's request to "amend or clarify" his order so they could
pursue limited claims. Late last month, CA itself, through law firm Sullivan
& Cromwell, asked the judge to certify its right to pursue the claims. That
decision is pending.
Lawyers for Wyly say CA made missteps in failing to seek the legal
clearances long ago.
"I think the strategic error CA made is sort of becoming obvious," said
William Brewer, partner of the firm Bickel & Brewer, representing Wyly and
his Ranger Governance. "We'll continue to highlight the fact that we asked
them to do this years ago."
In addition to claims that Wang paid D'Amato, the filings by Wyly's Ranger
Governance also allege, without elaborating, that D'Amato and board member
Lewis Ranieri ( former chairman) "knew of and directed the cover-up of the
fraud at CA." The Aug. 30 filing also makes reference to an Oct. 20, 2003
meeting between Ranieri and Stephen Richards, the former CA executive vice
president who is serving an seven-year prison term for fraud and conspiracy
charges. Wyly alleges that CA's special litigation committee "failed to
accurately report" a conversation between the men, in which Ranieri is
alleged to have "instructed Richards…to meet with the SEC and misrepresent
the truth in order to continue the cover up of the fraud at the company."
CA spokesman Dan Kaferle noted that CA, two weeks before that meeting, had
acknowledged accounting irregularities in a financial statement, suggesting
Ranieri would have no reason to request that Richards lie.
In addition, he said, "The court has rejected the Wyly arguments. We
interpret that as saying the allegations do not have any merit." The special
litigation committee report makes reference to the meeting with Richards,
saying Ranieri didn't recall the meeting but that his "script" for such
encounters was that employees should "talk to the government and tell the
truth."
Copyright © 2007,
Newsday Inc.
|