|
Proposal to Remove Directors
See also
Reports
of Professional Analyses
Shareholder Proposal to Remove
Directors
and
CA Perspective on
Shareholder Rights to Representation
(March 28 - June 26, 2006)
See also
Board Adoption of
"Majority Voting" for Election of Directors
(February 28, 2007)
For independent director observations
of past director performance, see
Report of CA Board's Special
Litigation Committee
(April 13,
2007)
See also
Corporate Crime Reporter,
November 28, 2005:
"Interview with David Pitofsky"
[former Assistant US Attorney responsible for
Computer Associates cases]
History
of Controversy
September 15,
2006 Newsday:
"CA, investors
gear up to meet | Sagging stock prices and activists urging shareholders
to withhold votes for board members promise a lively Monday session"
June 30,
2006 Global Proxy Watch:
"Shield"
June 25, 2006
New York Times:
"Soviet-Style
Proxies, Made in the U.S.A."
June 11, 2006
New York Times:
"Finally,
Shareholders Start Acting Like Owners"
June 5, 2006 Newsday:
"Challenge at CA: End the turmoil"
May 15, 2006
TheStreet.com:
"CA Stability Still on
Hold"
April 30, 2006 New York
Times
"Can't Take It Anymore?"
April 27, 2006 Wall Street
Journal
"CA Turns To SEC In Fight Vs Proposal On Directors'
Ouster"
April 27, 2006 New York
Times
"The Shareholder Spring"
April 2, 2006 New York Times
"One
Share, One Vote: One Big Test"
See also
Reports relating to another shareholder proposal
testing poison pill policies:
May 11, 2006 The
Deal
"Shareholder files
suit against CA"
and
June 27, 2006 Dow Jones Newswires:
"CA Inc. To Add Proposal Bounced By Courts To July Proxy"
|