Inviting Suggestions for Effective Management of Dell Appraisal Case
Responding to recent reports raising further questions about relying
upon the currently designated lead petitioners to manage the Dell
appraisal case,[1] the Cavan petitioner
that had initiated the proceeding for Forum participants acted today
to allow the formal court appearance of Special Counsel.[2]
Cavan and the other Petitioners with unchallenged dissenter rights –
funds managed by Ballentine and Magnetar – are also actively
considering alternatives for a collaborative management plan that
would allow each of them to help guide the continuing progress of the
case.
Suggestions of objectives for the new management plan will be welcomed
from non-petitioner claimants in the Dell case as well as from any
Forum participants interested in developing case management practices
that may be applied to other cases. While our top priority will
necessarily be to minimize disruption of the court proceeding, we
should also take advantage of opportunities to improve the benefits to
claimants.
An example of opportunities being considered to benefit claimants is
to establish regular progress reporting, with quarterly updates as
well as special reports of any major developments, so that Petitioners
and other claimants can keep informed of their investment interests
without the burdens – and costs – of individual inquiries through
their lawyers, or directly to lead counsel whose expenses will be
allocated to all claimants. By following what is a standard practice
for most types of investments, we should be able to improve both the
quality and the cost-efficiency of the appraisal process.
We will of course report whatever plan is established, and will
continue to invite your suggestions of opportunities to make the
process more effective for all investors.
GL –
May 26, 2015
Gary
Lutin
Chairman, The Shareholder Forum
575
Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022
Tel:
212-605-0335
Email:
gl@shareholderforum.com
|