June 2, 2002The Big Board Is
Standing Up for Independence
By GRETCHEN
MORGENSON
he
term "business ethics" does not have to be an oxymoron. But in today's
scandal-a-minute atmosphere, it has surely become one. Public trust in
corporate America has been undeniably shattered. What is less clear is exactly
how and when confidence in the markets, regulators, and business in general
will be restored.
Winning back trust will take far longer than the time it took to lose it,
of course. But a step in the right direction is expected this week, when the
New York Stock Exchange announces its prescriptions for how the companies
whose shares it trades can improve their corporate governance.
Since February, the Corporate Accountability and Listing Standards
Committee of the exchange has been reviewing requirements that it makes of its
listed companies to increase accountability and integrity in their boardrooms.
The committee's report on this effort and its proposals will be released
Thursday. The New York Times obtained a copy of the report last week from a
person involved in its development.
The proposals are significant and will create discomfort in some otherwise
comfortable corporate boardrooms. The exchange will submit the proposals for
public comment for two months. New rules go into effect in August.
The biggest change is the Big Board's proposal to require that independent
directors are a majority of a company's board. At the moment, Big Board rules
require just three independent directors per board, regardless of its size.
As their boards are now configured, one-quarter of the exchange's listed
companies do not meet the proposed standard, according to Carol Bowie,
director of Governance Research Services at the Investor Responsibility
Research Center in Washington.
Ms. Bowie identified Family Dollar Stores, the Chemed Corporation and the
EMC Corporation as companies where less than half of the directors are
independent. To meet the Big Board's standard, these and many other companies
will have to reconfigure their boards and introduce new independent directors.
The exchange also wants to tighten its definition of "independent." For a
director to be considered independent, the report states, the board must
determine and affirm in its regulatory filings that the director has no
material relationship with the company. Details on the relationships and why
the company does not consider them to be material will also be required.
Any director who has worked for the company in the previous five years will
not be considered independent, and no director now or formerly affiliated with
an auditor of the company can be independent until five years after that
affiliation has ended. Current cooling-off periods at the Big Board are three
years.
Another significant proposal would require nonmanagement directors at each
company to meet regularly without management present. This is intended to
promote open discussion among outside directors.
Shareholders would also gain more control over stock option plans. All
stock option plans will have to be put to shareholder votes. Now, companies
are required to put to a shareholder vote only those plans offered to officers
or directors; broad-based plans are exempt. The new rules would forbid
brokerage firms who hold shares for their customers from voting those shares
on any stock option plan unless the broker has instructions from the customer
to do so. Currently, a firm is free to vote the shares as long as it has not
received instructions from the owner.
The proposals also say that directors' fees must be the sole compensation
that an audit committee member receives from the company and that a member of
the committee associated with a major shareholder that owns 20 percent or more
of the company's shares may not vote on audit committee matters.
Ms. Bowie said the proposals in the Big Board report "will insure a
substantial level of independent thinking on the boards." Not a moment too
soon.
Daniel Webster said: "Confidence is a thing not to be produced by
compulsion." It must be earned, hour by hour. At last, that process is
beginning.
Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company