Forum for Shareholders of Farmer Bros. Co.

Forum Home Page

2007 Conclusion

Forum activities relating to Farmer Bros. Co. were suspended in 2007, following the second year of new management.

Farmer Bros. Home Page

 

Farmer Bros. Reference

 

 
latimes.com

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-farmer16dec16,1,1771719.story?coll=la-headlines-business

CALIFORNIA

Coffee Roaster Tells of SEC's Concerns

With 70% of its assets in cash and securities, Farmer Bros. might fall under purview of law for investment firms.

By Jerry Hirsch
Times Staff Writer

December 16, 2003

Farmer Bros. Co. management for the first time acknowledged that the Securities and Exchange Commission had raised questions about whether the cash-rich coffee roaster should be complying with the more stringent disclosure rules that govern investment firms.

Whether Farmer Bros., which lists about $298 million in cash and securities — an amount equal to about 70% of its assets — should comply with the Investment Company Act of 1940 has been one of the key issues in a bitter fight between institutional and dissident shareholders and the Torrance-based company's board of directors.

A proposal by mutual fund Franklin Mutual Advisors to force Farmer Bros. to adhere to the Investment Company Act failed at the company's annual shareholder meeting a year ago. Unlike operating companies such as manufacturers and retailers, investment companies must adhere to strict disclo- sure and corporate governance rules designed to protect investors.

In an SEC filing Monday, Farmer Bros. said the agency had raised "concerns" that the business might be acting as "an unregistered securities company."

Other than to say that it disagrees, Farmer Bros. did not elaborate on the extent of the SEC's concerns.

A spokesman for the SEC also declined to comment except to say that the wording used by the company could cover everything from a formal investigation to a review by the division that examines corporate regulatory filings.

Still, critics of Farmer Bros. seized on the disclosure as evidence that the company may have violated federal law.

Gary Lutin, a New York investment banker who manages an Internet forum for Farmer Bros. shareholders, said, "They have had two years to come up with some reason why they shouldn't be considered an investment company and they haven't."

Farmer Bros. is under fire from certain shareholders about loans to its Employee Stock Ownership Plan, which they say is being used as a tool to increase management's control over the company.

If the SEC deems that Farmer Bros. is an investment company, those loans may have violated federal securities law.
 


 

The Forum is open to all Farmer Bros. shareholders, whether institutional or individual, and to professionals concerned with their investment decisions.  Its purpose is to provide shareholders with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their evaluations of alternatives.  As stated in the Forum's Conditions of Participation, participants are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

There is no charge for participation.  Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, the manager of funds owning approximately 12.6% of Farmer Bros. shares, provided initial sponsorship for the Forum and arranged for it to be chaired by Gary Lutin.  Continuing support and guidance of the Forum is provided by an Advisory Panel of actively interested shareholders.

For additional information or to be included in an email distribution list, send an inquiry to farm@shareholderforum.com.