Forum for Shareholders of Farmer Bros. Co.

Forum Home Page

2007 Conclusion

Forum activities relating to Farmer Bros. Co. were suspended in 2007, following the second year of new management.

Farmer Bros. Home Page

 

Farmer Bros. Reference

 

Note:  The article below incorrectly attributes pricing targets for a purchase offer to the Forum manager.  The reporter's requests for such personal views were in fact declined, and he was referred to the analysis presented in the January 7, 2005 Forum Report which suggests that competent managers should be able to generate shareholder values in excess of $40 per share for all the assets owned by Farmer Bros. Co.  Responding to the reporter's further questions about pricing, the Forum manager told him only that most professionals would expect buyers to be willing to pay a price closer to the $40 realizable value per share than to the $20 current trading range of the stock.

The reported speculations about the need for a hostile offer are not based on any views of the Forum manager, who stated that he had no reason to believe that either management or the Farmer family interests would oppose an offer that may be attractive to public shareholders and the ESOP's employee beneficiaries.

Another interview subject, Jack Norberg of Standard Investment Chartered, sent the following letter to the LA Business Journal requesting correction of the views attributed to him in the article's two concluding paragraphs:

 

Los Angeles Business Journal  
Farmers’ Bitter Dispute Grinding Toward New Chapter
By MATT MYERHOFF - 10/3/2005
Los Angeles Business Journal Staff

In their long-running battle with family-controlled Farmer Bros. Co., outside shareholders have opened a new and unusual front. They’re attempting to line up a sale of the Torrance-based coffee distributor – on their own, without management’s involvement or its sanction.

Such an effort is a long-shot, at best. But that isn’t stopping Gary Lutin, a New York investment banker who has facilitated an online forum for Farmer Bros. shareholders for several years.

“We’ve given up on the board doing its job and therefore shareholders have taken the initiative to negotiate the required alternatives,” said Lutin, president of the investment firm Lutin & Co. “You simply need someone else to assume responsibility for the company. It’s feasible.”

Also unlikely. With Farmer Bros. continuing to lose market share to more nimble competitors, its stock has fallen below $20, a level not seen since early 2001. Now it’s questionable whether anyone would even offer to buy the company at the $30 to $35 per share that Lutin would like to see.

Then there’s the opposition likely to emanate from the Farmer family, which owns 39.5 percent of the stock. (An employee stock ownership program that sides with management owns another 20 percent.)

“In a second- or third-generation business like Farmer Bros., there are typically family members who aren’t tuned in to the marketplace and believe that the company can resurge,” said analyst Stephen Pettisse at Golden Spike Resources Group in Westwood. “Given that situation, finding somebody who can financially take the family out for what the family thinks the company is worth is definitely a long-shot.”

Last month, Lutin notified Farmers shareholders that, “since there are no indications that current management will either improve performance,” he was organizing a program “to explore and negotiate” strategic alternatives for Farmer Bros. He invited interested shareholders to join in if they were willing to respect required confidentiality conditions.

Farmer Bros. officials would not comment, but spokesman Jim Lucas said that the board has a fiduciary duty to consider any proposal and must explain why it would reject an offer.

In practical terms, it’s unlikely that Lutin’s group will come up with an offer that management would accept, so any prospective buyer would have to be pursue a hostile deal.

Longtime Chairman and Chief Executive Roy F. Farmer beat back numerous attempts at shareholder activism before his death in March 2003. His son, Roy E. Farmer, then took over and continued in a similar vein until he killed himself in January. Since then, Guenter Berger, a 44-year Farmer Bros. employee who was vice president of production since 1990 has been at the helm.

Lutin said the dissident group held back for about six months before realizing little change would occur under Berger’s watch. Dissident shareholders, including Franklin Mutual Advisors LLC, a Short Hills. N.J., investment firm with a 13 percent stake in Farmer Bros., accuse the Farmer family of mismanaging the company and enacting merger and acquisition defenses, including a “poison pill” to keep tight control of the company.

They have urged the board for several years to use its large amount of cash – about $200 million – to modernize or expand the company or pay dividends. When that failed, they pleaded for them to sell off the company or take it private.

Farmer Bros. is struggling to keep pace with the booming coffee market while other coffee companies have rising profits.

For the fourth quarter ended June 30, Farmer Bros. reported a loss of $3.7 million, compared with net income of $2 million in the year-earlier period. Revenues rose to $50.2 million from $47.4 million.

By comparison, Peet’s Coffee & Tea Inc., a specialty coffee producer based in Emeryville, reported net income of $2.6 million for the quarter ended July 3, compared with $1.8 million for the like period a year earlier. Revenues rose to $41.7 million from $33.6 million.

Large operators such as Starbucks Corp. and Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, owned by International Coffee & Tea LLC, have taken competition it up a notch by getting mainstream consumers accustomed to specialty coffees and teas.

To compete, smaller companies have opened retail stores, invested in restaurants and offered premium coffees, said Farmer Bros. shareholder Jack Norberg, chairman of Standard Investment Chartered Inc. of Costa Mesa.

While sympathetic, Norberg thinks Lutin and the dissidents have no chance of winning.

“We own less than 1 percent of Farmer Bros.,” he said, “and quite frankly, we’ve become so tired of the whole thing that we started selling it off, even at a loss.”


Los Angeles Business Journal, Copyright © 2005, All Rights Reserved.

 

The Forum is open to all Farmer Bros. shareholders, whether institutional or individual, and to professionals concerned with their investment decisions.  Its purpose is to provide shareholders with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their evaluations of alternatives.  As stated in the Forum's Conditions of Participation, participants are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

There is no charge for participation.  Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, the manager of funds owning approximately 12.6% of Farmer Bros. shares, provided initial sponsorship for the Forum and arranged for it to be chaired by Gary Lutin.  Continuing support and guidance of the Forum is provided by an Advisory Panel of actively interested shareholders.

For additional information or to be included in an email distribution list, send an inquiry to farm@shareholderforum.com.