Friday January 12, 2018
[commentary of Josh Black, editor]
The
announcement by Jana
Partners and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS)
of a campaign to force Apple to enhance parental controls on its
iPhones by tinkering with software has understandably dominated the
airwaves for much of the week.
With no financial or
governance criticisms apparent, this is indeed a new departure for an
activist. And Apple, for all its wealth, remains a peculiarly
vulnerable company – few others would be guaranteed the same media
scrutiny (perhaps Wells Fargo, chosen as a likely target by Reuters’
Breakingviews survey respondents, would come close).
While most will judge
the campaign by its immediate outcomes, both on Apple’s share price
and on the steps it takes to address the investors’ concerns, the
pivotal issue will be how successful Jana is at raising assets for its
Jana Impact Capital fund. CalSTRS, which has nearly $800 million
invested with environmental, social and governance (ESG) specialists,
is finalizing external manager proposals for four new ESG mandates
after a year’s search but has no immediate plans to invest in Jana’s
new fund, a spokesperson told me yesterday.
Activists have already
dialed up their commitments to ESG issues, leading to some frustration
on the management side that issuers have been on the defensive. Nelson
Peltz this week said his Trian Partners were “big believers” in ESG,
while Blue Harbour Group signed the United National Principles on
Responsible Investment (UNPRI) last year. ValueAct Capital Partners
says on its website that investing in and managing companies for the
long term “requires the highest standards of integrity, a deep
understanding of industry structure and business strategy, and a
consideration of relevant social, ethical and environmental issues.”
Some of these efforts
are viewed with more credibility than others, but there is widespread
evidence that it is activists, rather than companies, that are
internalizing the mood of the times. Few have been placed on the
defensive quite as much as Bill Ackman, who once faced questions about
how he squares investing in Oreo-manufacturer Mondelez with criticism
of “society-damaging” Coca-Cola.
In any case, fundraising
on the back of ESG is both new and interesting. Activists' assets
under management appear to be stagnating, or growing slowly. In
contrast, the impact investment market is already $114 billion and
growing 17-18% per year, according to the Global Impact Investing
Network (GIIN). Just 14% of the total is invested in public equities,
and given the long/short equity hedge fund community has had a tough
time with pension funds recently, the opportunity is obviously too
good to pass up.
At the very least,
subscribing to ESG principles ticks a few boxes on due diligence
questionnaires. A successful launch for Jana Impact could change how
seriously activists take the topic. Already, Jana has won praise for
being ahead of its peers. CamberView Partners, a shareholder
engagement advisory firm, says Jana’s campaign will give Barry
Rosenstein’s firm a “‘halo’ effect” among the investment community.
With Exxon’s shareholder
proposal woes last year, issuers had plenty of warning about the
importance of ESG engagements. Less noticed this week, Hermes EOS
launched its U.S. stewardship efforts with the hiring of Tim Youmans
from CECP: The CEO Force for Good. Hermes, the former British Telecom
pension fund manager, still invests for some clients but has also
carved out a business engaging with companies on behalf of asset
owners. The first full week of 2018 suggests that the pressure is
going to be applied faster than expected, and from unexpected
quarters.
Copyright © 2018 Activist Insight |