Activism
Activist Investing Today:
Hamermesh on Icahn, Bylaws and Insider Votes
By
Ronald Orol
| Published: June 22nd, 2020
Delaware law and corporate
governance expert Lawrence Hamermesh offers his thoughts on activist
books and record requests, company advanced-notice bylaw litigation
victories and more.
There isn’t much clarity in Delaware law about whether activist hedge
funds should get access to corporate books and records when seeking to
bolster their dissident director election contests.
That’s the view of Widener University professor emeritus Lawrence
Hamermesh, who spoke with The Deal for its Activist Investing Today
podcast about what the Delaware Supreme Court might be thinking about
as it considers billionaire insurgent Carl Icahn’s request for private
communications at target Occidental Petroleum Corp. (OXY).
“I can’t remember a case that squarely raised the issue of, ‘How about
being allowed to dig into a transaction where there is a legitimate
difference in views as a business matter but not a claim of
wrongdoing?'” Hamermesh said. “Is that fair game, to dig into [books
and records] in aid of a proxy contest? It isn’t very clear.”
In addition to books and records litigation, Hamermesh explained why
he thinks two recent Delaware court decisions are a big positive for
corporate advanced-notice bylaws as well as why he believes sunset
provisions for insider-controlled share voting structures come with
their own problems.
|