COMMENTARY •
DISNEY
The last flicker of the candle as Peltz melts
BY JEFFREY
SONNENFELD AND STEVEN
TIAN
January
19, 2023 at 11:04 AM EST
Nelson Peltz is the founder of Trian Fund
Management.
TASNEEM ALSULTAN - BLOOMBERG - GETTY IMAGES
|
Given the sharp contrast between Disney chief
Bob Iger’s widely celebrated performance record–with cumulative total
shareholder returns
of 554% during his tenure–and the ambiguous performance of activist
Nelson Peltz’s Trian fund, CNBC anchor David Faber
recently wondered on air, “Why would Peltz persist in his battle
[over Disney]?”
It seems Peltz needs the drama and attention. Like the last
flicker of a candle before flaming out, it’s a sign of desperation. Based on our
careful, original analysis of his investment track record, at least
half of the companies that have (or had) Peltz on their board underperform the
S&P during the entirety of his tenure. We shared our analysis with Peltz. His
response, in a brief email, was, “Jeffrey, check your nos.” I have, and I stand
by them.
Not that Peltz makes this objective analysis of his track record
easy. Unlike
many of his activist peers, Peltz hasn’t put his comprehensive
performance data forward. Trian’s performance is thus unavailable to the
shareholders and executives of the companies he targets. We are instead supposed
to trust his own unsupported claims about superior performance–despite his track
record of having to file
regulatory corrections with the SEC for misstating performance.
Smoke and bluster add to the confusion. In a CNBC
interview last week, Peltz bewilderingly likened the iconic American
brand of Walt Disney to the Chinese Communist Party. Would it be just as
ludicrous to draw parallels between Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Nelson Peltz
because they both brag about their performance but do not transparently share
the actual numbers? Why conceal the facts if they are so impressive? Are they
just modest or afraid of peer envy?
That is not likely since Peltz is
shuttering funds under pressure from investors. His major U.K.
investment trust “Trian Investors I” apparently has not been
actively enlisting major new investors or fundraising the last few years and is
currently undergoing
liquidation.
Perhaps his investors are turning for the exits because, despite
Peltz’s forceful sales rhetoric on TV, the facts are that he appears
to be destroying value rather than adding any, since at least half
the companies who have had Peltz on their board underperformed the
S&P 500 index during the entirety of his board tenure–measured by both share
price performance and total shareholder returns (TSR). These include:
-
Wendy’s:
Peltz has sat on Wendy’s board since the inception of Trian Partners in
November 2005, until now, during which Wendy’s shares have underperformed the
S&P by 5.1% annually, and Wendy’s TSR has underperformed the S&P by 4.93%
annually.
-
Mondelez:
Peltz was on Mondelez’s board from January 2014 to March 2018, during which
Mondelez’s shares underperformed the S&P by 3.59% annually, and Mondelez’s TSR
underperformed the S&P by 4.14% annually.
-
Janus
Henderson: Peltz sat on Janus Henderson’s
board from February 2022 to November 2022, during which Janus Henderson shares
underperformed the S&P 500 by a whopping 23.19% annualized, and TSR trailed by
19.81% annualized.
-
Legg
Mason: Peltz’s first stint on the Legg
Mason board was from October 2009 to December 2014, during which
Legg Mason shares underperformed the S&P 500 by 1.75% annually, and TSR
trailed by 2.92% annually.
-
MSG
Sports: Peltz has served on the MSG
Sports board from October 2015 to the present, during which MSG Sports shares
have underperformed the S&P 500 by 4.93% annually, and TSR has trailed by
6.32% annually.
And it’s not just Peltz. Trian surrogates on boards, namely his
son-in-law Ed Garden, the CEO of Trian, seem to have performed no better with
their roles on boards, including not only the notorious Chemtura which rode into
bankruptcy but also:
Even in some of his successful investments, the companies
succeeded by largely doing the opposite of what he advocated.
At Pepsi, despite Peltz’s
2014 entreaties, CEO Indra Nooyi smartly refused to divest North
American and International beverages, heave
off Frito Lay, or staple
together Pepsi’s winners with Peltz’s losing
hand at Mondelez.
At P&G, despite a lengthy
2017 white paper with granularly proposed re-organizations, the two
ideas Peltz pushed the most with the board–which were to move some
business out of its Cincinnati headquarters “just for disruption” and
to decentralize
M&A to give it to the business units–were wisely rejected.
So why in the world should Disney’s shareholders, largely small
retail investors across America, trust Peltz when his own sophisticated
investors are fleeing for the exits and when they would have been better off
putting their money in an index fund?
Peltz thinks he can spin his way out of
answering these hard questions by constantly staying on the offense,
frenetically bouncing from one proxy fight to another amidst a constant swirl of
drama and attention, and launching a barrage of ill-supported, trite accusations
against the same Disney leadership that he eagerly embraced just four years ago
(not to mention
false personal attacks against
critics
like
me).
But even the avuncular Peltz cannot outrun his own track record forever as
Disney shareholders make their choices.
Jeffrey Sonnenfeld is the Lester Crown Professor in Management
Practice and Senior Associate Dean at Yale School of Management. Steven
Tian is the director of research at the Yale Chief Executive Leadership
Institute.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are
solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and beliefs of Fortune.
© 2023 Fortune Media IP
Limited. |