BANKS
|
INCOME INVESTING
Regional Banks’ Dividends
Look Safe Despite Panic
By
Lawrence C. Strauss
Updated March 17, 2023 10:24 am ET / Original March 16, 2023 8:15 pm
ET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22dfa/22dfafa58de06febc0b35fee6f3032e224b10dbf" alt=""
A U.S. Bancorp bank branch in Louisville, Ky.
Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg
|
The Silicon Valley Bank failure set
off an earthquake that’s still reverberating across the regional bank
landscape.
The SPDR
Regional Banking exchange-traded fund (ticker: KRE)
has lost about a third of its value since March 8, when the bank’s
liquidity problems surfaced publicly. The upheaval raises an important
question for investors in regional bank shares: How safe are their
dividends, a key attraction of these stocks? Answer: safer than some
fear.
Reflecting the uncertainty, many of these stocks sport high yields in
the 4%-6% range because their share prices have plummeted. (Yields
move inversely to prices.)
Truist Financial (TFC),
a large regional bank based in Charlotte, yields 6.5%, compared with
an average of 4.3% over the past 12 months. Minneapolis-based U.S.
Bancorp (USB) is at 5.4%, versus its one-year
average of a little more than 4%. KeyCorp (KEY),
headquartered in Cleveland, is at 7%—more than three percentage points
above its average of 3.7%.
These banks face plenty of headwinds that certainly will make dividend
growth challenging in the short run. Case in point: First
Republic Bank (FRC), which announced Thursday that
it will receive an infusion of $30 billion of uninsured deposits from
a group of banks, said it has suspended its dividend.
Many banks are likely to have to keep raising the rates they pay on
deposits to help stabilize their funding and prevent rapid
withdrawals—a dynamic that contributed to the failure of Silicon
Valley Bank. Signature
Bank (SBNY), one of the relatively few banks that
dealt with cryptocurrency companies, also failed.
To
shore up their finances, some banks might have to cut back on making
loans, pressuring earnings. “The best way to preserve liquidity or
build liquidity is to slow down your lending,” says Dave Ellison, a
portfolio manager at Hennessy Funds and a specialist in bank stocks.
“There’s less money out the door.”
And
if the economy deteriorates further, possibly into a recession, banks
likely would have to bolster their loan-loss reserves. All of these
factors will weigh on earnings. That, in turn, will affect dividend
growth.
Still, “I don’t think [these banks] are anywhere close to thinking
that they have to cut dividends,” says Ellison. His sentiments were
echoed by three other investment professionals with whom Barron’s spoke
for this column.
One of them, Anton Schutz, longtime manager of the RMB
Mendon Financial Services fund (RMBKX), which
focuses on small-cap issues, thinks a more likely scenario for
regional banks is a pause in share buybacks. He doesn’t foresee
dividend cuts.
David Katz, chief investment officer at Matrix Asset Advisors, expects
“the best/strongest banks to continue to pay their dividends.” But
Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse could lead the Federal Reserve to
restrict payout increases this year.
Reasonably Solid Dividends
Barring a severe recession, these banks should have the financial
strength to sustain their dividends, though payout growth is likely to
slow.
Company / Ticker |
Recent Price |
Dividend Yield |
Market Value (bil) |
Price Change Since March 8* |
Fifth Third Bancorp / FITB |
$25.41 |
5.2% |
$17.4 |
-39.4% |
KeyCorp / KEY |
11.75 |
7.0 |
10.9 |
-47.5 |
M&T Bank / MTB |
124.89 |
4.2 |
21.0 |
-23.6 |
PNC Financial Services Group / PNC |
125.05 |
4.8 |
50.0 |
-28.6 |
Truist
Financial / TFC |
32.1 |
6.4 |
45.6 |
-41.0 |
U.S. Bancorp / USB |
35.44 |
5.4 |
54.3 |
-33.5 |
Note:
Prices and price changes as of March 15; other data as of March 16.
*March 8 is when SVB Financial Group's sale of bonds from its
portfolio at a loss was first disclosed publicly.
Source: FactSet
Among the regional bank stocks Katz favors are Truist Financial, U.S.
Bancorp, and PNC
Financial Services Group (PNC), which yields 4.8%.
Gerard Cassidy, a bank analyst at RBC Capital Markets, views the
Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank blowups as outliers. “What
caused the problem for these two banks was a funding issue,” he says.
“The mix of deposits is important.”
In
a research note, Cassidy writes that in last year’s fourth quarter,
93.8% of Signature Bank’s deposits were uninsured—meaning they were
larger than the $250,000 in individual accounts covered by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corp. The tally was 89.3% at Silicon Valley Bank’s
parent, SVB
Financial Group (SIVB)—the second-highest level
among banking companies followed by RBC Capital Markets.
In
contrast, the ratio of uninsured deposits to total deposits was 57.2%
at U.S. Bancorp, 54.3% at Truist, 59.3% at KeyCorp, 52.7% at M&T
Bank ( MTB ),
and 54.5% Fifth
Third Bancorp (FITB), according to RBC.
In
response to the regional bank crisis, federal officials said that
depositors at Silicon Valley and Signature will be made whole. On
March 12, the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC issued a statement
saying that the Fed would “make available additional funding to
eligible depositary institutions to help assure banks have the ability
to meet the needs of all of their depositors.”
Katz expects that banks overall “will do fine and fully recover” and
that their stocks will eventually move higher. But he cautions that
risks have risen and the time frame for recovery has become extended.
Ellison expects banks to emphasize improving their liquidity, even at
the expense of earnings, over the next several quarters.
Cassidy agrees that these banks are likely to be less profitable for a
time, but he considers their dividends secure. He sees a much
different situation this time, versus what happened in the financial
crisis 15 years ago. In 2008-09, a major credit crisis clobbered
payouts. “We don’t have that this time,” he says.
Back then, plenty of banks cut or suspended their dividends. In early
2009, for example, U.S. Bancorp slashed its payout to a nickel a share
from 42.5 cents. KeyCorp halved its dividend, to 18.75 cents, in March
2008, then trimmed it twice more, eventually down to just a penny.
In
a recent note, Cassidy said he expects “buying opportunities will
present themselves” after some near-term bumps on deposit outflows. He
cited banks such as Fifth Third Bancorp, yielding 5.2%; KeyCorp; PNC;
M&T, 4.2%; Truist; and U.S. Bancorp.
Although Cassidy doesn’t expect any of the larger regional banks that
he follows to cut their dividends, a severe economic downturn would
change his expectations. “If you’re going to tell me that we’re going
to have a recession this year with unemployment at 10%, then all bets
are off,” he warns.
Bottom line: Investors must closely monitor news about the regional
banks, even if most are unlikely to cut their dividends. Forewarned is
forearmed, especially in times like these.
Write to Lawrence
C. Strauss at lawrence.strauss@barrons.com
|