Financial Times, July 17, 2023, article: "BlackRock offers a vote to retail investors in its biggest ETF" [Testing a strategy of letting fund customers assume responsibility for proxy voting decisions]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Testing a strategy of letting fund customers assume responsibility for proxy voting decisions

 

For other Forum attention to the recent development of policies and technologies supporting increased retail investor involvement in the voting of corporate stock, see

 

Source: Financial Times, July 17, 2023, article

 

Exchange traded funds

BlackRock offers a vote to retail investors in its biggest ETF

Index fund providers have come under fire from both left and right over their influence on US companies

 

BlackRock will ask investors to chose among policies ranging from voting with management to prioritising Catholic values or environmental, social and governance factors © Bloomberg

Brooke Masters in New York JULY 17 2023


BlackRock will give retail investors in its biggest exchange traded fund the chance to participate in proxy voting in 2024, as the $9.4tn asset manager moves to rebut Republican claims that it pursues a “woke agenda”.

The world’s biggest money manager has joined fellow index fund providers State Street and Vanguard in experimenting with ways to involve ordinary investors in voting on shareholder proposals at a time when their collective influence on US companies has come under fire from both left and right.

Investors in BlackRock’s iShares Core S&P 500 ETF will be asked to choose among seven different general policies ranging from voting generally with management to prioritising Catholic values or environmental, social and governance factors. Investors can also tell BlackRock to continue voting their shares. Customers will not be able to cast specific votes on individual companies.

The fund, known as IVV, has more than $342bn in assets, making this the largest retail proxy voting effort to date. Charles Schwab started polling retail investors in three funds last year, Vanguard ran a pilot project involving three funds this spring and State Street launched a larger programme in April.

Republican politicians at the state and federal level have accused big fund managers of putting social and environmental goals ahead of investors’ financial returns, which they all deny.

Progressive social activists, meanwhile, are angry that the money managers have been supporting a smaller share of shareholder proposals on climate issues than they did in 2021. The fund managers contend that the proposals have become too prescriptive and are not in investors’ interest.

Both sides contend that the big providers have too much power because they hold as much as 20 per cent of the shares of many US companies.

BlackRock and the other asset managers argue that they simply provide what their clients want, whether it is ESG-influenced investing or a pure focus on profits. Pushing the decisions on proxy voting down to clients helps make that claim more credible. It also could take some of the heat off on particular votes, because the shares will no longer be voted as a single bloc.

BlackRock already gives institutional customers controlling $2.1tn in index assets the option of choosing how their shares are voted, and $555bn had done so by the end of March. In the retail pilot, IVV’s holdings will be voted in proportion to the share of investors who select each policy.

“BlackRock is committed to a future where every investor can have the choice to participate in the shareholder voting process,” said Joud Abdel Majeid, global head of investment stewardship.

The money manager is also working on a UK programme that will allow retail asset owners to vote, but it has not yet been rolled out to customers.

Vanguard’s pilot, which concluded last month, gave retail investors in three of its funds the chance to chose among four different options vote with management, abstain, ESG or let Vanguard choose. It said in a statement: “We plan to build on the success of our pilot by expanding it for next proxy season so we can further test and validate our approach.”

State Street’s programme, which allows investors to chose among seven options ranging from pro-labour to pro-management, aims to include 82 per cent of all of its eligible equity assets by the end of the year. It is starting with 57 index ETFs and mutual funds. Its flagship S&P 500 fund, SPY, the world’s largest with $431bn in assets, is not eligible because of rules surrounding its structure as a unit trust.


Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.