Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Application of professional investment analyses to popular technology growth stocks

 

 

For other recent applications of analytics to currently popular stock investments by the author of the article below, see:

See also the main page of the Shareholder Forum's project defining Returns on Corporate Capital for the earlier series of articles by this columnist providing a foundation for selecting investments based on a company's ability to generate sustainable profits, and for the Forum's "investor tool" that demonstrates analyses of 5,700 SEC-reporting companies with 5-year data available in 2017 when the project was concluded.

 

Source: Dow Jones MarketWatch, August 24, 2023 (updated August 26, 2023), article

 

Deep Dive

Can Nvidia keep growing this quickly? Here’s what Wall Street thinks.

Last Updated:  Aug. 26, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. ET
First Published: Aug. 24, 2023 at 10:06 a.m. ET

By Philip van Doorn

Nvidia increased revenue by 88% from the previous quarter and blew past its own expectations. Now we look ahead to see how long its AI ramp is expected may continue.

MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphoto

Nvidia is a phenomenon. The question for investors is whether or not it is too late to load up on the company’s shares. Does this sound familiar? It should, in light of the history of Tesla’s sales growth after it introduced the Model 3 in 2017. Then again, Nvidia’s story is different, as the purchase of its expensive graphics processing units, or GPUs, supports a broad array of industries that are upgrading systems to roll out artificial intelligence technology.

Below we screen the semiconductor manufacturing space for expected sales growth rates through 2025. But first, it may be interesting to take a look at what appears to be a high valuation for Nvidia’s shares, and consider how well supported the valuation is by profit margins.

To set the stage, Nvidia reported sales of $13.5 billion for the second quarter of its fiscal 2024, ended July 30, which was an 88% increase from the previous quarter and a 101% increase from a year earlier. The company’s own guidance had been for $11 billion in sales for the July 30 quarter, which would have been a 53% sequential increase. For next quarter, Nvidia CFO Colette Kress expects sales of roughly $16 billion, which would be a 19% sequential increase and a 170% increase from $5.93 billion in the third quarter of the company’s Fiscal 2023, which ended Oct. 31, 2022.

Nvidia’s valuation compared with those of the S&P 500 and Tesla

By traditional measures, Nvidia Corp.’s NVDA stock is expensive. The shares closed at $471.16 Tuesday, up 222% for 2023, excluding dividends. Based on that price, the stock traded for 34.3 times the consensus earnings estimate for the next 12 months among analysts polled by FactSet (these estimates were provided by FactSet early on Wednesday). The stock was trading for 19.6 times the consensus sales estimate for the next 12 months.

In comparison, the forward price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 SPX was 18.6 and the index’s forward price-to-sales estimate was 2.3 at the close on Tuesday.

For starters, Nvidia’s forward P/E of 34.3 may not seem outrageously high for a rapidly growing technology company. And that P/E is less than twice the company’s forward price-to-sales ratio, while the S&P 500’s P/E is more than eight times its price/sales ratio. That underscores how profitable Nvidia has become.

For its most recent reported quarter Nvidia’s gross margin was 70.93%, improving from an already impressive 43.48% a year earlier, according to FactSet. The company’s operating margin for the quarter was 54.06%, up from 13.08% a year earlier. The S&P 500’s second-quarter gross margin was a weighted 32.68%, narrowing from 33.32% a year earlier, while its operating margin was 14.71%, down from 15.71% a year earlier, according to FactSet.

A company’s gross margin is its net sales, less the cost of goods or services sold, divided by sales. Net sales are sales minus returns and discounts, such as coupons. The cost of goods or services sold includes the actual costs for making the items or providing the services, including labor.

A company’s operating margin is its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) divided by sales.

In the case of Nividia, the high gross margin underscores the company’s pricing power, as its founder and CEO Jensen Huang emphasized in its earnings press release Tuesday afternoon.

“During the quarter, major cloud service providers announced massive NVIDIA H100 AI infrastructures,” with partnerships to bring Nvidia’s AI technology “to every industry,” Huang said.

Here’s a link to additional commentary about Nvidia’s quarterly performance from Kress.

Getting back to valuations, Tesla Inc. TSLA remains a fast grower with second-quarter revenue up 47% from a year earlier. The stock trades at a forward P/E of 55.4 and a forward price-to-sales ratio of 6.3. So P/E is higher and price-to-sales is much lower than the corresponding ratios for Nvidia. Why? It is not only the slower sales growth rate.

Tesla’s gross margin for the second quarter was 18.19%, narrowing from 25% a year earlier. That shows the effect of the company’s decision to lower prices for its electric vehicles drastically. And it is considerably lower than the S&P 500’s gross margin, above, not to mention Nvidia’s. Tesla’s operating margin narrowed to 14.25% in the second quarter from 20.83% a year earlier. Its most recent operating margin sure looks good for a car manufacturer, but it isn’t very impressive if you consider Tesla to be a cutting-edge technology company.

Screening chip makers for sales growth expectations

For a broad screen of semiconductor manufacturers and companies that make equipment they use or provide related services, we began with the 30 companies held by the iShares Semiconductor ETF SOXX, which tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index SOX. Then we added the 30 additional companies in the S&P 1500 Composite Index XX:SP1500 in the semiconductor industry, as determined by FactSet, or in the “Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment” Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) group. (The S&P 1500 Composite is made up of the S&P 500, the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index MID and the S&P Small Cap 600 Index SML ).

While this list will exclude some of the newest or smallest industry players, it provides a reasonable point from which to look at sales estimates for the next few years, because S&P Global’s criteria for initial inclusion in the S&P Small Cap 600 Index includes positive earnings for the most recent quarter and for the sum of the most recent four quarters.

To compare the companies by expected sales-growth rates, we looked at consensus calendar year estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. We used calendar years for uniform comparisons because many companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar.

For Nvidia, we can look out to calendar 2026 and see that the consensus estimate is for the company’s sales to climb to $101 billion. That would make for a three-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.5% from the consensus estimate of $48.72 billion in sales for calendar 2023.

But for most of our group of 60 semiconductor companies, including most of the top 10 players by market capitalization, sales estimates are only available through calendar 2025. On this basis, Nvidia’s two-year CAGR would be 31.3%, based on the consensus sales estimate of $84.01 billion for 2025.

Among the 60 semiconductor companies, consensus sales estimates are available through 2025 for 48 of them. Here are the 20 for which analysts expect to see the highest sales CAGR from calendar 2023 baselines. Annual sales estimates are in millions of U.S. dollars.

Company

Ticker

Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2025

Est. 2023 sales

Est. 2024 sales

Est. 2025 sales

Forward P/E

Forward price/ sales

Wolfspeed Inc.

WOLF

34.9%

$955

$1,240

$1,737

N/A

5.6

Nvidia Corp.

NVDA

31.3%

$48,722

$71,187

$84,011

34.3

19.6

SiTime Corp.

SITM

30.7%

$146

$201

$249

150.3

16.0

First Solar Inc.

FSLR

27.2%

$3,537

$4,688

$5,725

16.4

4.5

Enphase Energy Inc.

ENPH

22.7%

$2,699

$3,182

$4,063

21.5

5.9

SolarEdge Technologies Inc.

SEDG

21.1%

$3,846

$4,613

$5,636

15.7

2.2

Rambus Inc.

RMBS

19.9%

$563

$667

$809

28.0

9.7

Teradyne Inc.

TER

19.9%

$2,680

$3,267

$3,852

26.7

5.3

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. ADR

TSM

19.5%

$67,413

$81,588

$96,232

17.1

6.0

Universal Display Corp.

OLED

17.9%

$583

$694

$811

32.9

11.0

Power Integrations Inc.

POWI

17.6%

$499

$598

$690

38.6

8.6

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

AMD

17.2%

$22,869

$27,534

$31,413

29.8

6.8

Ceva Inc.

CEVA,

16.5%

$111

$126

$150

62.4

4.2

Ichor Holdings Ltd.

ICHR

16.5%

$804

$929

$1,091

32.7

1.1

Monolithic Power Systems Inc.

MPWR

15.6%

$1,820

$2,081

$2,432

41.0

12.5

Ultra Clean Holdings Inc.

UCTT

15.0%

$1,719

$1,946

$2,274

22.9

0.8

Cohu Inc.

COHU

15.0%

$655

$737

$866

16.4

2.4

Marvell Technology Inc.

MRVL

14.4%

$5,542

$6,362

$7,249

31.3

8.8

Onto Innovation Inc.

ONTO

14.4%

$820

$931

$1,073

27.4

6.5

United Microelectronics Corp. ADR

UMC

14.1%

$7,071

$8,062

$9,208

9.3

2.2

Source: FactSet

Click on the tickers for more about each company, including more estimates, ratings summaries and consensus price targets.

Nvidia ranks second, which is notable because the company that tops the list, Wolfspeed Inc. WOLF, is expected to have annual sales of less than $1 billion for calendar 2023. There is no P/E for this company on the table because it isn’t expected to achieve profitability until the third quarter of calendar 2025.

 

About the Author

Philip van Doorn

Philip van Doorn writes the Deep Dive investing column for MarketWatch.

 

 
     Copyright ©2023 MarketWatch, Inc.

 

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.