Deep Dive
Can Nvidia keep growing this quickly? Here’s what Wall Street thinks.
Last
Updated: Aug. 26, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. ET
First Published: Aug. 24, 2023 at 10:06
a.m. ET
—
By Philip
van Doorn
Nvidia increased revenue by 88% from the
previous quarter and blew past its own expectations. Now we look ahead
to see how long its AI ramp is expected may continue.
MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphoto
|
Nvidia is a phenomenon. The question for investors is whether or not
it is too late to load up on the company’s shares. Does this sound
familiar? It should, in light of the history of Tesla’s sales growth
after it introduced the Model 3 in 2017. Then again, Nvidia’s story is
different, as the purchase of its expensive graphics processing units,
or GPUs, supports a broad array of industries that are upgrading
systems to roll out artificial intelligence technology.
Below we screen the semiconductor manufacturing space for expected
sales growth rates through 2025. But first, it may be interesting to
take a look at what appears to be a high valuation for Nvidia’s
shares, and consider how well supported the valuation is by profit
margins.
To set the stage, Nvidia reported sales of $13.5 billion for the
second quarter of its fiscal 2024, ended July 30, which was an 88%
increase from the previous quarter and a 101% increase from a year
earlier. The company’s own guidance had been for $11 billion in sales
for the July 30 quarter, which would have been a 53% sequential
increase. For next quarter, Nvidia CFO Colette Kress expects sales of
roughly $16 billion, which would be a 19% sequential increase and a
170% increase from $5.93 billion in the third quarter of the company’s
Fiscal 2023, which ended Oct. 31, 2022.
Nvidia’s valuation compared with those of the S&P 500 and Tesla
By traditional measures, Nvidia Corp.’s NVDA stock
is expensive. The shares closed at $471.16 Tuesday, up 222% for 2023,
excluding dividends. Based on that price, the stock traded for 34.3
times the consensus earnings estimate for the next 12 months among
analysts polled by FactSet (these estimates were provided by FactSet
early on Wednesday). The stock was trading for 19.6 times the
consensus sales estimate for the next 12 months.
In comparison, the forward price-to-earnings
ratio for the S&P 500 SPX was
18.6 and the index’s forward price-to-sales estimate was 2.3 at the
close on Tuesday.
For starters, Nvidia’s forward P/E of 34.3 may not seem outrageously
high for a rapidly growing technology company. And that P/E is less
than twice the company’s forward price-to-sales ratio, while the S&P
500’s P/E is more than eight times its price/sales ratio. That
underscores how profitable Nvidia has become.
For its most recent reported quarter Nvidia’s gross margin was 70.93%,
improving from an already impressive 43.48% a year earlier, according
to FactSet. The company’s operating margin for the quarter was 54.06%,
up from 13.08% a year earlier. The S&P 500’s second-quarter gross
margin was a weighted 32.68%, narrowing from 33.32% a year earlier,
while its operating margin was 14.71%, down from 15.71% a year
earlier, according to FactSet.
A company’s gross margin is its net sales, less the cost of goods or
services sold, divided by sales. Net sales are sales minus returns and
discounts, such as coupons. The cost of goods or services sold
includes the actual costs for making the items or providing the
services, including labor.
A company’s operating margin is its earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) divided by sales.
In the case of Nividia, the high gross
margin underscores the company’s pricing power, as its founder and CEO
Jensen Huang emphasized in its earnings
press release Tuesday afternoon.
“During the quarter, major cloud service providers announced massive
NVIDIA H100 AI infrastructures,” with partnerships to bring Nvidia’s
AI technology “to every industry,” Huang said.
Here’s a link to additional
commentary about Nvidia’s quarterly performance from
Kress.
Getting back to valuations, Tesla Inc. TSLA remains
a fast grower with second-quarter revenue up 47% from a year earlier.
The stock trades at a forward P/E of 55.4 and a forward price-to-sales
ratio of 6.3. So P/E is higher and price-to-sales is much lower than
the corresponding ratios for Nvidia. Why? It is not only the slower
sales growth rate.
Tesla’s gross margin for the second quarter was 18.19%, narrowing from
25% a year earlier. That shows the effect of the company’s decision to
lower prices for its electric vehicles drastically. And it is
considerably lower than the S&P 500’s gross margin, above, not to
mention Nvidia’s. Tesla’s operating margin narrowed to 14.25% in the
second quarter from 20.83% a year earlier. Its most recent operating
margin sure looks good for a car manufacturer, but it isn’t very
impressive if you consider Tesla to be a cutting-edge technology
company.
Screening chip makers for sales growth expectations
For a broad screen of semiconductor
manufacturers and companies that make equipment they use or provide
related services, we began with the 30 companies held by the iShares
Semiconductor ETF SOXX, which
tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index SOX. Then
we added the 30 additional companies in the S&P 1500 Composite Index XX:SP1500 in
the semiconductor industry, as determined by FactSet, or in the
“Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment” Global Industry
Classification Standard (GICS) group. (The S&P 1500 Composite is made
up of the S&P 500, the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index MID and
the S&P Small Cap 600 Index SML ).
While this list will exclude some of the
newest or smallest industry players, it provides a reasonable point
from which to look at sales estimates for the next few years, because
S&P Global’s criteria
for initial inclusion in the S&P
Small Cap 600 Index includes positive earnings for the most recent
quarter and for the sum of the most recent four quarters.
To compare the companies by expected sales-growth rates, we looked at
consensus calendar year estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. We
used calendar years for uniform comparisons because many companies
have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar.
For Nvidia, we can look out to calendar 2026 and see that the
consensus estimate is for the company’s sales to climb to $101
billion. That would make for a three-year compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of 27.5% from the consensus estimate of $48.72 billion in sales
for calendar 2023.
But for most of our group of 60 semiconductor companies, including
most of the top 10 players by market capitalization, sales estimates
are only available through calendar 2025. On this basis, Nvidia’s
two-year CAGR would be 31.3%, based on the consensus sales estimate of
$84.01 billion for 2025.
Among the 60 semiconductor companies, consensus sales estimates are
available through 2025 for 48 of them. Here are the 20 for which
analysts expect to see the highest sales CAGR from calendar 2023
baselines. Annual sales estimates are in millions of U.S. dollars.
Company
|
Ticker
|
Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2025
|
Est. 2023 sales
|
Est. 2024 sales
|
Est. 2025 sales
|
Forward P/E
|
Forward price/ sales
|
Wolfspeed Inc.
|
WOLF
|
34.9%
|
$955
|
$1,240
|
$1,737
|
N/A
|
5.6
|
Nvidia Corp.
|
NVDA
|
31.3%
|
$48,722
|
$71,187
|
$84,011
|
34.3
|
19.6
|
SiTime Corp.
|
SITM
|
30.7%
|
$146
|
$201
|
$249
|
150.3
|
16.0
|
First Solar Inc.
|
FSLR
|
27.2%
|
$3,537
|
$4,688
|
$5,725
|
16.4
|
4.5
|
Enphase Energy Inc.
|
ENPH
|
22.7%
|
$2,699
|
$3,182
|
$4,063
|
21.5
|
5.9
|
SolarEdge Technologies Inc.
|
SEDG
|
21.1%
|
$3,846
|
$4,613
|
$5,636
|
15.7
|
2.2
|
Rambus Inc.
|
RMBS
|
19.9%
|
$563
|
$667
|
$809
|
28.0
|
9.7
|
Teradyne Inc.
|
TER
|
19.9%
|
$2,680
|
$3,267
|
$3,852
|
26.7
|
5.3
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. ADR
|
TSM
|
19.5%
|
$67,413
|
$81,588
|
$96,232
|
17.1
|
6.0
|
Universal Display Corp.
|
OLED
|
17.9%
|
$583
|
$694
|
$811
|
32.9
|
11.0
|
Power Integrations Inc.
|
POWI
|
17.6%
|
$499
|
$598
|
$690
|
38.6
|
8.6
|
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
|
AMD
|
17.2%
|
$22,869
|
$27,534
|
$31,413
|
29.8
|
6.8
|
Ceva Inc.
|
CEVA,
|
16.5%
|
$111
|
$126
|
$150
|
62.4
|
4.2
|
Ichor Holdings Ltd.
|
ICHR
|
16.5%
|
$804
|
$929
|
$1,091
|
32.7
|
1.1
|
Monolithic Power Systems Inc.
|
MPWR
|
15.6%
|
$1,820
|
$2,081
|
$2,432
|
41.0
|
12.5
|
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc.
|
UCTT
|
15.0%
|
$1,719
|
$1,946
|
$2,274
|
22.9
|
0.8
|
Cohu Inc.
|
COHU
|
15.0%
|
$655
|
$737
|
$866
|
16.4
|
2.4
|
Marvell Technology Inc.
|
MRVL
|
14.4%
|
$5,542
|
$6,362
|
$7,249
|
31.3
|
8.8
|
Onto Innovation Inc.
|
ONTO
|
14.4%
|
$820
|
$931
|
$1,073
|
27.4
|
6.5
|
United Microelectronics Corp. ADR
|
UMC
|
14.1%
|
$7,071
|
$8,062
|
$9,208
|
9.3
|
2.2
|
Source: FactSet
|
Click on the tickers for more about each company, including more
estimates, ratings summaries and consensus price targets.
Nvidia ranks second, which is notable
because the company that tops the list, Wolfspeed Inc. WOLF, is
expected to have annual sales of less than $1 billion for calendar
2023. There is no P/E for this company on the table because it isn’t
expected to achieve profitability until the third quarter of calendar
2025.
About the Author
|
Philip van Doorn
Philip van Doorn writes the Deep Dive investing
column for MarketWatch. |
Copyright ©2023 MarketWatch, Inc.
|