Editor’s Note:
Chuck Callan is a Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs and
Mike Donowitz is a Vice President Regulatory Affairs at Broadridge
Financial Solutions. This post is based on their Broadridge
memorandum. |
Highlights from the 2023 Proxy Season
Shareholder support overall is at its lowest level in five years.
Support is lower for management proposals and for shareholder
proposals alike. We believe this is due—at least in part—both to a
decline in market valuations (support for directors and Say-on-Pay
proposals generally tracks stock price movements) and a general
decrease in support for ESG proposals because many companies have
taken steps to be more proactive and transparent.
Specifically, the data shows that:
-
Expectations of directors are increasing.
654 directors failed to attain majority support, the greatest
number in five years.
-
Support has declined for Say-on-Pay. 131
Say-on-Pay proposals failed to receive majority support. The
average level of support (at 86.3%) was the lowest in five years.
-
More shareholder proposals and less
support. While there were more shareholder proposals (588) than at
any time over the past five years, shareholder support for them
fell to 24.6% on average (a 10 percentage point drop from last
season).
-
The climate has cooled for ESG. Support
for environmental and social proposals decreased to 25.5%, on
average, from 30% the prior season and was the lowest in five
years. And support for corporate political spending proposals
decreased by 11 percentage points to 27.1%, on average, from 38%
the prior season (the lowest in five years).
-
More retail investors are finding their
voice. Retail share ownership is at its highest level in five
years. As a group, retail investors held 31.5% of the shares in
the 2023 proxy season (up from 29.6%, five years ago) while
institutions held the balance (at 68.5%). Voting participation by
retail shareholders inched up to 29.6% of the shares they hold
from 29.4% last year.
There continues to be a gap in voting sentiment between retail
investors as a group and institutional investors. For example, when it
comes to environmental and social proposals, retail investors cast 16%
of their votes in favor, while by contrast, institutions cast 25.5% of
their votes in favor. Institutional support has declined markedly
during the past three seasons, but is still greater than retail
support.
What to Expect in 2024
VIRTUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS (VSMs)
The number of virtual-only meetings in 2023 was close to the all-time
high at the height of the pandemic and few companies will return to an
in-person only meeting format. Companies and shareholders are
realizing the benefits of online meetings as the technology continues
to advance.
CLIMATE AND CYBERSECURITY DISCLOSURES
New SEC
rules begin to require public companies to disclose
material cyber security incidents in 2024, through a form 8K, along
with information on their cyber security risk management and
governance practices in their annual 10K.
The SEC is expected to adopt final climate disclosure rules for public
companies in the fall of 2023. As proposed, there is a phased-in
approach for different sized companies over the next few years.
IMPACT OF UNIVERSAL PROXY
Some industry stakeholders had expected the SEC’s 2022 Universal Proxy
rules to dramatically increase the number of proxy contests. Thus far,
the rules seem to have little impact on the number of opposition
solicitations that actually go to a distribution. The number of
contests was within a typical range over the past three years.[1]
PASS-THROUGH VOTING
Pass-through voting is the practice of providing retail investors in
institutional accounts with a voice on how asset managers should vote
their proxies. We are seeing greater adoption of pass-through voting
by fund companies through a variety of technologies and approaches.[2]
Five-Year Trends
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS
Expectations of directors are increasing. Fewer directors stood for
election this past season (23,829) than in 2022 season, but more
failed to attain majority support (654) than at any time in the last
five years. On average, institutional investors cast 31.4% of their
votes against directors while retail shareholders cast 26.3% of their
votes against directors. Moreover, 2,161 directors failed to surpass
the 70% support threshold that is closely watched by some governance
advocates and proxy advisors. The decline in director support may be
due in part to shareholder displeasure with lower or flat market
valuations at some firms as well as new voting policies from proxy
advisory firms.
SAY-ON-PAY
Support has declined for Say-on-Pay. 131 Say-on-Pay proposals failed
to receive majority support. Average support for Say-on-Pay proposals
this past season was 86.3%, the lowest in five years. A closer look at
the data shows that low support for Say-on-Pay correlates to low
support for corporate directors. That is, 31.5% of issuers who failed
to achieve at least 50% favorability on their Say-on-Pay proposals
also had at least one director fail to achieve majority support.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
More shareholder proposals and less support. The number of shareholder
proposals submitted for a vote increased significantly to 588 this
season from 510 last season and shareholder support fell to 24.6% from
34.4% in 2022. Institutional investor support declined to 25.7% this
past season from 36.2% in 2022, and retail support declined from 20%
in 2022 to 17.6% in 2023, the lowest levels in five years. There
continues to be a significant voting divergence among these segments
of investors.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL
PROPOSALS
The climate has cooled for ESG. The number of environmental and social
proposals decreased to 137 this season, from 142 the prior season. [3] Overall,
support decreased to 25.5% of the votes, on average, this season from
30.3% the prior season the lowest in five years. This was due largely
to a decline in institutional support and persistently low levels of
retail support generally.
POLITICAL SPENDING PROPOSALS
Overall shareholder support for corporate political spending proposals
decreased by 11 percentage points to 27.1%, on average, this past
season from 38.3% the prior season. Institutional investors cooled to
these proposals at most firms.
SHARE OWNERSHIP
More individual investors are entering the market. As a group, retail
ownership grew from 30.6% to 31.5% of the “beneficial” shares we
processed, the highest percentage in the last five years. This is due
in part to the continuing growth of managed accounts.
SHAREHOLDER VOTING
More retail investors are finding their voice. As a group, retail
investors voted 29.6% of the shares they owned in 2023, a slight
uptick from the prior year. However, voting participation by
institutional investors was at its lowest level in five years. This
was primarily driven by a decline in voting by smaller institutional
investors (at small and microcap companies).
Endnotes
1Some
proxy contests settle after materials are distributed and before a
meeting occurs. Excludes non-U.S. issuer meetings.(go
back)
2https://www.broadridge.com/_assets/pdf/broadridge-pass-through-voting.pdf(go
back)
3Environmental
proposal types include, but are not limited to reports on climate
policies, greenhouse emissions, and deforestation. Social proposal
types include, but are not limited to reports on human and civil
rights audits, employee rights, and privacy and information.(go
back)
Harvard Law School Forum
on Corporate Governance
All copyright and trademarks in content on this site are owned by
their respective owners. Other content © 2023 The President and
Fellows of Harvard College. |