Wall Street Journal, February 19, 2025, article: "Hedge-Fund Fees Eat Up Half of Clients’ Profits" [Investment adviser study of multi-decade hedge fund performance]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Investment adviser study of multi-decade hedge fund performance

 

 

 

Source: Wall Street Journal, January 19, 2025, article


Markets & Finance  |  Investing

Hedge-Fund Fees Eat Up Half of Clients’ Profits

Over the past two decades, fees have amounted to more than 50% of gross gains, LCH research finds

By Caitlin McCabe

Jan. 19, 2025 7:01 pm ET

Hedge-fund returns have moderated in recent years, while fees have crept higher. PHOTO: BEAWIHARTA/REUTERS

Hedge-fund investors often gripe about high fees. A new report puts the problem in sharp relief.

Just over half of the industry’s total gross performance was eaten away by fees over the past two decades, according to LCH Investments. That compares to about 30% between 1969 and the early 2000s, said the company, which manages and advises on investments in hedge funds on behalf of investment firm Edmond de Rothschild and other investors. 

“This increase in the proportion of gross gains being paid away in fees is clearly not to the advantage of investors,” said Rick Sopher, chairman of LCH.

Viewed another way, hedge funds have earned $3.72 trillion since the late 1960s—and kept nearly $1.8 trillion of that in fees. 

The worsening ratio of fees to gains reflects how hedge-fund returns have moderated in recent years, while fees, especially fixed management charges, have crept higher. Many firms take a management fee of 2% of assets, plus a performance fee equating to 20% of fund profits. Some outfits, including behemoth “multimanager” firms such as Citadel, charge much more. 

LCH released the findings alongside its annual “Great Money Managers” ranking of hedge funds, based on the lifetime gains they have generated, in dollars, for clients. Some key findings:

New York-based D.E. Shaw was on top for 2024, making investors $11.1 billion after fees for the year.

Citadel remained the most profitable money manager since inception, earning clients $83 billion since 1990. In 2024, it returned $9 billion in net gains to clients.

London-based Marshall Wace made LCH’s list for the first time. It made $4.5 billion in net gains last year, and $29.5 billion since starting in 1997.

The top 20 managers, a group that also includes Millennium ManagementBridgewater Associates and Elliott Management, oversee about 20% of industry assets but are responsible for a higher share of gains. In 2024, LCH estimates that 32% of industrywide net gains were made by those top firms.

LCH compiles the report based on meetings with managers, audited and management reports, internal estimates and other confidential sources. The firm has invested in many of the funds on the list since 1969.

Industry fees have long been contentious. In an open letter last year, dozens of large investors in hedge funds demanded changes to how managers are paid.

On fees, LCH found: 

The top 20 managers have kept 34.3% of gross gains, less than the rest of the industry.

That reflects “higher gross returns, more stable capital bases and their tendency not to generate large drawdowns,” Sopher said.

The lower fee ratio is notable because many of the top 20 firms are multimanager firms. They typically charge investors the costs of running their funds, including items such as signing bonuses and technology, in a “pass-through” fee model.


Write to Caitlin McCabe at caitlin.mccabe@wsj.com

Appeared in the January 21, 2025, print edition as 'Hedge-Fund Fees Eat Up Half Of Clients’ Profits, Report Says'.

Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.