Note: The transcript and slide
presentation of the March 12, 2008 analyst presentation reported below
were filed with the SEC at 11:55AM on May 14, 2008, after the article
below was published:
The reported $9 billion charges had in
fact been explained previously in identical sections of the following SEC filings,
captioned "Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined Financial Information"
(pages 68-78 of both reports), based on purchase accounting provisions
for the difference between the estimated $10.3 billion "fair value of
Bear Stearns’ pro forma net assets at November 30, 2007" and an
estimated $1.4 billion purchase price:
|
Financial Times, May 14, 2008
article
JPMorgan faces higher charge of $9bn to
cover Bear Stearns' clean-up
By Francesco Guerrera and
Ben White in New York
Published: May 14 2008 03:00 | Last updated: May 14 2008 03:00
JPMorgan Chase is to take a charge of about $9bn - half as much again as its
estimate - to clean up Bear Stearns' balance sheet and pay for redundancies
and litigation arising from its cut-price takeover of the stricken
investment bank.
Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan's chairman and chief executive, told a banking
conference organised by UBS that the higher costs were driven by the losses
suffered by Bear this year and the larger than expected amount of bad assets
on its books.
Mr Dimon said he remained optimistic on the long-term benefits of the $1.5bn
takeover of Bear but the success of the deal would have to be judged in
future years.
The increase in the one-off charge underlines the challenges presented by a
take-over that was agreed after only two days of negotiations under pressure
from the regulators worried that Bear's collapse would spark a rout in the
global financial markets.
When the all-share deal was announced in March, JPMorgan said it would set
aside $6bn to shrink Bear's balance sheet and pay for potential litigation
and the costs associated with any layoffs.
JPMorgan has had to lift the offer price from $2 to $10 per Bear share,
valuing the investment bank at $1.5bn, to quell investor and employee anger
at the deal.
JPMorgan executives say the final figure will depend on what else they find
on Bear's balance sheet and how easy it is to wind down assets and agree
redundancies. JPMorgan has offered jobs to about 6,000 of Bear's 14,000
employees and is helping others to find positions elsewhere.
In spite of the higher charge and other losses, Bear was expected to boost
JPMorgan's second quarter earnings by $1bn and its total equity by $2bn -
below previous estimates of a $5bn equity contribution - Mr Dimon said.
From 2009, Bear is expected to contribute more than $1bn a year to
JPMorgan's profit.
Separately, JPMorgan has disclosed it faces potential civil charges from the
Securities and Exchange Commission as part of a probe into the bidding for
municipal bonds.
JPMorgan's purchase of Bear is not the only fire sale deal to run into
difficulty. Bank of America, which has agreed to buy Countrywide, the
troubled mortgage lender, for $4bn has come under pressure from some
shareholders to pay far less or walk away.
Liam McGee, president of BofA's global consumer and small business unit,
told the UBS conference he expected the bank's losses on its home equity
portfolio to surpass its previous forecast of between 2 per cent and 2.5 per
cent.
Copyright The
Financial Times Limited 2008
|
|