Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: Inviting suggestions of expertise needed to consider
Bear Stearns shareholder alternatives
Please note that yesterday's announcement of
plans for a May 14 open meeting of the Bear Stearns
Forum, copied again below, indicated that the "Invited Experts" are to
be determined in response to Forum participant suggestions of what they
consider relevant. Your advice of questions or issues that you'd like to
address at the meeting will be appreciated now, so that we have time to
find someone who can provide authoritative expertise.
On the subject of legal challenges, for
example, we've anticipated the need for Bear Stearns shareholders to
understand what's happening with the shareholder lawsuits that had been
initiated to challenge the proposed JPMorgan acquisition, now consolidated
in the New York State Supreme Court of New York County as In Re Bear
Stearns Litigation, Index No. 600780/08.* The senior partner of a
court-designated "liaison" firm for the attorneys representing plaintiffs
has accepted our invitation to report on the status of the case
and respond to questions. (See Part II of the Agenda, below.)
I will appreciate your suggestions to guide
the Forum's efforts to serve your information requirements.
- GL
Gary Lutin
Lutin & Company
575 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212/605-0335
Email: gl@shareholderforum.com
______________________
Open Meeting
of the
Shareholder
Forum for Bear Stearns
Review of
Practical Shareholder Alternatives
In a post-panic re-examination of legal issues and transaction
alternatives, the purpose of this meeting is to define practical means by
which the necessary transfer of Bear Stearns control might be concluded on
terms that are fair to all parties, and that do not set a precedent for
allowing crisis-generated suspensions of marketplace rules.
Reports of
Forum workshops and invited experts will provide a foundation for open
discussion, in which all meeting participants may offer views to guide the
development of practical alternatives that shareholders might consider – and
that a court as well as JPMorgan Chase might find reasonable – before a
scheduled May 29 vote on the currently proposed transaction.
Agenda
Part I: Legal challenges
§
Report of Forum workshop on issues and strategies
§
Report of court-appointed liaison counsel on shareholder
class action
§
Participant questions and views
Part II: Alternative transaction terms
§
Report of Forum workshop on potential substitute structures
§
Participant questions and views
Part III: Definition of proposed alternatives
§
Participant views of identified alternatives
§
Participant suggestions of additional alternatives
Invited
Experts
[To be determined, in response to Forum participant suggestions of relevant
expertise]
Note: As stated in the Forum’s
Conditions of Participation, all meeting participants are expected to
make independent use of information obtained through the Forum and must
respect the Forum privacy rule that participants will not be identified or
quoted without their explicit permission. Additional information is
available on the
Forum web site.
April 30, 2008
* Address registration requests to:
nyssa.reservation@shareholderforum.com
|