In its annual
Institutional Investment Report, which was released on November
11, The Conference Board provides a comprehensive analysis of the asset
growth and portfolio composition of institutional investors operating in
the United States. It documents the presence over 30 years of different
types of institutional investors in single asset classes such as equity,
debt securities, alternative instruments, and foreign securities, drawing
on data from a wide range of sources. This year’s report includes
definitive data for 2009 and focuses on the impact of the financial market
rebound on institutional asset value and investment decisions.
Following 2008’s dramatic
decline of the securities markets, by the end of 2009 the investment
industry had registered substantial gains across virtually all classes of
financial instruments, with total institutional assets rising 14 percent
to $25,351.1 billion—a level similar to that recorded between 2005 and
2006. This constitutes an extraordinary upward movement from the 21.3
percent plunge of 2008, albeit still far from the best performances of an
industry that between 1995 and 2007 had experienced unprecedented growth
of 23.3 percent on an annualized basis. Of course, the historical
significance of this finding should also be put in context with the new
economic uncertainties and the added market volatility of the last few
months.
The following are the other
major findings discussed in the report.
Return to confidence
by retail investors rewarded investment companies
Mutual funds and other
investment companies, which had seen the fastest growth in the last few
decades, were hit the hardest by the recent market decline and capital
withdrawals, with outflows totaling 30.7 percent of their 2007 asset
value, or $2,503.5 billion for the year 2008. For 2009, the asset value
for investment companies increased by $1,553.2 billion, an inflow of 11.6
percent of 2007 values. By comparison, in 2009, pension funds lost 10.5
percent of their 2007 asset value whereas insurance companies experienced
a 1.8 percent contraction. However, pension funds grew 18.5 percent of
their 2008 asset value whereas insurance companies experienced a 6.5
percent annual appreciation.
Even gains did not
alter the institutional landscape
At the end of 2009, pension
funds were still the leading category, holding 39.9 percent of total
institutional assets. Investment companies had regained the market share
that appeared to have been lost to insurance companies in 2008. As a
result of the risk tolerance improvements of retail investors, insurance
companies and savings institutions—which had slightly expanded at the
height of the crisis—retracted to levels registered prior to the crisis.
Institutions remained
committed to their investment policies
Equities remained the
investment of choice for state and local pension funds (which
traditionally are long-term investors) and open-end investment companies
(which traditionally are more engaged in equity trading activities),
whereas life insurance companies invested as much as 63.4 percent of their
assets in securities that guarantee a fixed income.
Pension fund managers
increased exposure to alternative assets
At the end of 2009, as much
as 27.9 percent of total pension fund assets were invested in alternative
instruments (an asset class that includes real estate, private equity,
hedge funds, and cash equivalents), the highest level seen by the industry
to date.
Savings institutions
wrote off significant mortgage value losses
Savings and depository
institutions are only marginally exposed to equity, but they were
penalized by the quality deterioration of certain other asset classes in
their portfolios—especially residential and non-residential mortgage
loans—which continued in 2009 despite the stock market recovery. In 2009,
due to a surge of loan defaults, the share of savings institution assets
invested in mortgages plunged to 50.5 percent, from 59.4 percent
registered at the end of 2008 and the peak of 69.1 percent at the end of
2006.
Equity portfolio of
institutions recovered from 2008 deterioration levels
At the end of 2009,
institutional equities had recovered to $10,238.7 from $8,127.3 billion in
2008, their lowest level since the late 1990s. However, when measured as a
percentage of outstanding U.S. equities, aggregate institutional positions
showed a regression to the ratios that were being reported by The
Conference Board a decade ago (50.6 percent, down from 51.5 last year). In
comparison, during the 2001-2002 recession, institutions were still
holding as much as 51.3 percent of total outstanding equities.
Institutional bond
portfolio grew in value and market share
In the last decade,
institutional bonds measured as a percentage of total outstanding U.S.
bonds had stealthily declined (from 34.4 percent in the year 2000 to the
27.3 percent share registered for 2008). By the end of 2009, this negative
trajectory corrected for the first time, with the ratio showing a modest
upward movement to 28.1 percent.
New capital
injections in alternative instruments
Data shows that the decline
experienced by the hedge fund industry in 2008 continued into the first
quarter of 2009, but was then reversed by capital appreciations and a
renewed flow of investments into the asset class. Fueled by the liquid
nature of hedge funds and the outstanding performances of some alternative
investment strategies during the market rally that followed the crisis,
year-end assets under management were valued at over $1.6 trillion (a 13.7
percent increase over the 2008 level).
Hedge fund industry
consolidation still in process
Throughout 2009, despite the
formidable return to growth for hedge funds, the number of funds pursuing
this type of investment strategy remained at the trimmed level registered
during the peak of the recession, indicating that the financial
difficulties favored industry consolidation and restructuring.
Liquidations of hedge funds and funds of hedge funds amounted to 812 by
the end of 2008, and an additional 234 entities closed their operations in
2009.
The full report is available
here.
© 2010 The
President and Fellows of Harvard College |
|