Inside the mind of a shareholder.

Frustration is growing among shareholders as they continue to demand greater transparency on stratospheric CEO pay packages. This proxy season, it seems, shareholders have had enough; as a result, they are pushing back loudly on a variety of corporate governance matters that affect executive compensation. The backlash is being felt at annual general meetings across the nation and overseas, with shareholders carefully scrutinizing corporate governance and pay practices.

Many experts thought Dodd Frank would provide the answers to most of the governance problems companies face, and its provisions certainly touch on virtually every corner of the financial markets. But some Wall Street firms are struggling to stay in compliance with this legislation and this is something shareholders are factoring into their investment decisions. To be specific, one might wonder: what exactly do shareholders want? A recent survey by FTI Consulting, a global business advisory firm, sought to answer this question and the results were as follows:

(i) Executive compensation practices remain a major concern and rank high on shareholders’ agendas.

(ii) The annual say-on-pay vote on compensation is becoming increasingly important.

(iii) Investors are calling for greater board independence, quality oversight and effective governance measures that can help protect shareholder interests.

(iv) Shareholders are looking for companies to engage in annual corporate governance roadshows as a form of enhanced communications.

The report reveals that investors are now using their voting power to voice their concerns over dissatisfaction with performance. An astounding 72 percent of the 170 institutional investors polled feel anything more than 30 percent of shareholders voting against executive compensation is solid proof a corporate response is needed.

Meanwhile written communication is seen as a thing of the past. Ninety-two percent of shareholders are calling for more engagement with the board of directors through governance roadshows with more than 58 percent expecting these to be held once a year.

In short, shareholders want – and deserve – corporate governance transparency, enhanced executive compensation disclosures and better engagement.
 

© Copyright Cross Border Ltd. 1995–2012.

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of standards for conducting shareholder meetings with electronic participation. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

The organization of this Forum program was encouraged by Walden Asset Management, and is proceeding with the invited leadership support of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Intel Corporation to address issues relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to e-mtg@shareholderforum.com.