The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, April 9, 2020 posting by Michael Laff of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS): "Annual General Meetings & COVID-19" [Global adaptations of annual shareholder meetings to pandemic conditions]

The Shareholder ForumTM

Electronic Participation in Shareholder Meetings

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

"E-Meetings" Home Page

"E-Meetings" Program Reference

Forum reference:

Global adaptations of annual shareholder meetings to pandemic conditions

 

For the report summarized by its author below, see

For initial Forum attention to the communication issues addressed below, including previously widespread concerns about the use of "virtual-only" meetings, see the 2010 public program to establish marketplace standards for Electronic Participation in Shareholder Meetings.

 

Source: The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, April 9, 2020 posting

Annual General Meetings & COVID-19

Posted by Michael Laff, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., on Thursday, April 9, 2020

Editor’s Note: Michael Laff is a Senior Associate at Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. This post is based on his ISS memorandum.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, securities regulators in several countries have published guidance that affords publicly listed companies greater flexibility regarding the type of annual general meeting (AGM) they can hold as well as when it can be held.

As of March 31, the total number of meetings postponed or cancelled globally because of COVID-19 was approximately 557 while the number of meetings that will be virtual-only or proxy-only stood at 560. By comparison, that number stood at 286 for all of calendar 2019. These figures, as tracked by ISS and as illustrated below, are changing by the day as the pandemic is pushing into the traditional AGM season for many markets in the northern hemisphere.

Figure 1: Count of Virtual Meetings by Market as a Result of the Pandemic

Source: Institutional Shareholder Services; as of March 31, 2020; data is compiled based on alerts issued due to COVID-19 as disclosed by companies after the meetings had entered the ISS Global Meeting Services queue.; includes extraordinary and non-equity meetings. Does not necessarily include all meetings that have been announced as virtual in a market.

Similarly, regulatory agencies across varied jurisdictions are providing frequent updates to their policies on meetings and public reporting. Given the rapid pace of change, there is considerable disruption to the typical corporate reporting period and the AGM calendar.

Figure 2: Count of Adjourned/Cancelled Meetings by Market as a Result of the Pandemic

Source: Institutional Shareholder Services; as of March 31, 2020; data is compiled based on alerts issued due to COVID-19 as disclosed by companies after the meetings had entered the ISS Global Meeting Services queue.; includes extraordinary and non-equity meetings. Does not necessarily include all meetings that have been announced as postponed in a market.

This is a fast-changing area with new regulatory and other guidance coming out frequently at present regarding the hosting of AGMs and public reporting requirements. In most U.S. states, companies are generally able to hold either hybrid or virtual-only meetings without seeking shareholder approval. The SEC issued guidance on March 13, providing regulatory flexibility to companies that wish to change the date or location of their shareholder meeting or switch from an in-person meeting to a virtual meeting because of COVID-19.

Some companies may choose to take measures such as postponing their AGM, changing the format from a physical (in person) to a virtual meeting, or simply changing to another physical location to minimize public health concerns. Many companies shifted to online-only meetings after the SEC offered exemptions following a shareholder request.

The SEC staff is also encouraging companies to allow shareholder proponents or their representatives to present their proposals by telephone and not insist that they attend in person.

Companies that seek to make the change after their proxy materials have already been filed and mailed will not be required to amend their proxy statement or mail additional material to shareholders, provided that such companies issue a press release announcing the change, file it on EDGAR, and “take all reasonable steps necessary to inform other intermediaries in the proxy process and other relevant market participants of such change.”

Separately, the SEC has also provided publicly traded companies with a 45-day extension to file certain disclosure documents, including annual and quarterly reports. Such reports would otherwise have been due between March 1 and July 1, 2020. Companies must, among other conditions, explain through a current filing why the relief is needed in their particular circumstances.

Additionally, publicly traded companies may be exempt from providing hard copies of proxy statements and annual reports if the shareholder has a mailing address located in an area where mail delivery has been suspended as a result of COVID-19.

On March 23 the SEC announced temporary flexibility for registered funds affected by recent market events to borrow funds from certain affiliates and to enter into certain other lending arrangements. The relief is designed to provide funds with additional tools to manage their portfolios for the benefit of all shareholders as investors may seek to rebalance their investments.

The SEC also issued orders that would provide certain investment funds and investment advisers with additional time with respect to holding in-person board meetings and meeting particular filing and delivery requirements, as applicable.

Access an overview of regulatory updates in select countries regarding the hosting of AGMs and public reporting requirements as of March 31, 2020, here.

 

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
All copyright and trademarks in content on this site are owned by their respective owners. Other content © 2020 The President and Fellows of Harvard College.

 

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of standards for conducting shareholder meetings with electronic participation. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

The organization of this Forum program was encouraged by Walden Asset Management, and is proceeding with the invited leadership support of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Intel Corporation to address issues relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to e-mtg@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.