|
Management Attorney's Response to Shareholder Delegate's Demand for Records (December 27, 2005 - January 13, 2006) In a letter dated December 27, 2005, an attorney representing Farmer Bros. management proposed a form of "Confidentiality Agreement" as a condition of compliance with the company's acknowledged obligations to produce records in response to the shareholder Delegate's December 9, 2005 demand letter. A scanned copy of the letter with its proposed confidentiality form can be downloaded from the following link:
The Delegate's January 13, 2006 reply, the text of which is copied below, reminded the attorney that the original demand letter had invited "conventionally established" arrangements to deal with any specifically identified "trade secrets or other information that should be treated as confidential," and noted that the attorney's proposed form of "Confidentiality Agreement" was clearly "inconsistent with the essential purpose of a demand seeking information needed for investment decisions." Reference was made to an example of a conventional confidentiality agreement for records demands in another Forum program. In a subsequent January 26 - February 8, 2006 exchange of letters, the attorney offered revisions of his confidentiality form and reported management's willingness to prepare summaries of information, to which the Delegate responded by accepting the invitation to suggest summaries and by presenting issues to be addressed in further revisions of the confidentiality form.
|
|