Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note belo

w]

The Shareholder Forumtm

private project for adaptations of investment services

Supporting Investor Interests

 

 

THIS WEBSITE IS PROVIDED FOR PARTICIPANTS IN A PRIVATE PROJECT ADDRESSING THE SERVICES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE INTERESTS OF ULTIMATE INVESTORS. THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THIS PAGE IS NOT INTENDED FOR ANY OTHER USE.

 

Forum reference:

Development of services designed for support of independent investment advisors

 

Source: Institutional Investor, August 25, 2015 article


 

ASSET MANAGEMENT

AUGUST 25, 2015

RIA Start-ups Face a Complex World, but Help Is at Hand

Wealth managers striking out on their own are turning to custodians and other service providers for support.

By Andrew Barber

PHOTO CREDIT: SANSA IMAGES

“It’s exciting, and everything is moving very fast,” says David La Placa, founder, chairman and CEO of Intellectus Partners, a registered investment adviser focused on ultrahigh-net-worth clients. La Placa has had his hands full since he launched San Francisco–based Intellectus in June with president Jay Casey after the pair left Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the U.S. wealth management arm of Germany’s largest bank, where they oversaw roughly $3 billion.

Whether a wealth manager departs an investment bank, a private bank or a fee-based RIA, starting a new business is daunting. The founders must think about everything from regulatory filings and back-office support to investing in the right technology. In some cases, noncompete and nonsolicitation contracts come into play.

While adviser head count keeps falling at banks and brokerages large and small, independent firms have been bucking the trend for the past five years. By 2018 independent RIAs will oversee 28 percent of all U.S. retail assets, versus about 20 percent today, Boston-based research firm Cerulli Associates forecasts. The logic behind going it alone is simple: Although advisers can profit handsomely as relationship managers at a big bank or brokerage, at the end of their careers they won’t have equity.

The main worry for RIA start-ups is how many clients will follow them. Some experts say there’s no need to fret. In 2013, Cerulli estimated that on average, advisers leaving wire houses to set up their own firms kept 91 percent of targeted assets from their prior accounts. Also, moving individual accounts from one custodian to another has become more streamlined in recent years. “The process, frankly, is almost clinical,” says Peter Dorsey, San Diego–based head of sales, recruiting and transitions for TD Ameritrade, one of the largest U.S. custodians catering to RIAs.

Before clients can come through the door, though, a new RIA must have a clear direction. “The biggest mistake some advisers make is trying to wing it,” Dorsey warns. “It’s critical to have a business plan, and part of that plan needs to be deciding on how you measure success.”

Specialized consultants can lend a hand. “We focus on helping [advisers] to understand exactly what type of practice they want to create,” says Christopher Winn, founder and managing principal of AdvisorAssist, a Pembroke, Massachusetts–based consulting firm. Decisions can range from choosing the right office to determining if the firm needs several custodians for clients with different needs, Winn explains.

In a bid to keep clients whose advisers have launched their own firms, big banks claim that only they have the means to offer specialized services. Although some capital markets transactions are difficult, if not impossible, for independent wealth managers, custodians that cater to these businesses are offering more sophisticated platforms. “Things have changed a lot in the past ten years as major RIA custodians have pushed to create new technologies,” says TD Ameritrade’s Dorsey.

For Intellectus’s La Placa, whose clients include many tech entrepreneurs, investment banking’s role in wealth management has changed with the recognition that even after the credit crisis, Wall Street hasn’t shed its conflicts of interest. “The problem with the big banks is that they are built upside down,” he explains. “The client’s interests often come last instead of first.” As an independent, La Placa says, Intellectus can work with a broader set of commercial and investment banks to meet client needs without the conflicts that arise from doing everything in-house.

The firm chose Dynasty Financial Partners to manage all back-office and technology functions so it can focus on managing client relationships and investments. New York–based Dynasty offers a full-service, turnkey solution for major adviser teams going independent or seeking a single provider in place of à la carte offerings from specialist outfits.

“For the corner office, multimillion-dollar producer used to giving up 60 percent of revenue for complete support, it can make sense,” AdvisorAssist’s Winn says of full-service offerings. “For more modest practices, advisers with clients that have specialized needs or a practice that combines another discipline such as accounting, it may not.”

One thing many start-up advisers agree on is that their hard work is worth it: “The clients are more satisfied, and so are we,” La Placa says.

 


 
© 2015 Institutional Investor LLC.

 

 

 

This website is intended only for the private use of invited participants in a project addressing adaptations of investment management and advisory services to support the objectives of ultimate savers. Participation is subject to confidentiality understandings and other provisions that vary from the Shareholder Forum's standard Conditions of Participation applicable to its publicly conducted programs.

 

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.