Proposed buyout review
Riverbed Technology, Inc. (RVBD)
Record date for voting rights: |
[tbd] |
Shareholder vote: |
[tbd] |
Proposed buyer: |
Thoma
Bravo (with participants) |
Value of transaction: |
$3.6
billion |
Incorporation: |
Delaware |
In
another “forced sale” pressed by an activist, Riverbed Technology
reported on December 15, 2014 that it had agreed to be acquired by the
private equity firm Thoma Bravo (with participation of the Ontario
Teachers’ Pension Plan) at a price of $21.00 per share.[1]
It should be noted that this price simply matches a February 2014
offer by the activist, Elliott Management, which the company’s board
had determined at the time “continued to undervalue Riverbed relative
to its value as an independent company,” and that the alternative
agreement is with private equity investors that have stated their
intent to continue support of existing managers and their strategies.[2]
Public shareholders are therefore presented with a choice between
management’s auction price of the stock and an appraisal of the long
term enterprise value that management and Thoma Bravo are buying.
The
situation appears to satisfy the three screening criteria for the
Forum’s “Appraised
Value Rights ("AVR") Management”
support of shareholders considering this alternative:
1. |
Buyer
– The proposed transaction is a “standalone” buyout, without any
benefits of a business combination that might justify a buyer’s
offering more than the intrinsic value of the company. It is
therefore unlikely that the buyer, as an experienced professional
investor with access to insider information, will be able to
explain to the court – and also to its equity partners and lenders –
that the price it offered to pay was more than of its view of the
company’s intrinsic value. There is little risk that a court
appraisal would vary from past patterns for such standalone
buyouts.[3] |
2. |
Amount
– The size of the buyout is in a range that could justify public
registration for quoted AVR trading and “Level 1” pricing if
holders of a significant portion of the company’s stock demand
appraisal and request support of liquidity. In interest in
liquidity does not justify public registration, it in any event
likely that the size of this transaction will result in a
sufficient volume of appraisal demands to support market activity
with “Level 2” pricing of AVR investments. |
3. |
Jurisdiction
– The company is incorporated in Delaware, the state that provides
a well-defined and relatively predictable process for appraisal
rights. |
The company can be
expected to file its definitive proxy statement setting a record date
any time after late January for a shareholder vote in February or
early March. The Forum will therefore welcome requests of record date
shareholders for reservations of Riverbed AVR Management.
GL – January 14,
2015 (update of
preliminary December 16, 2014 review)
Gary Lutin
Chairman, The
Shareholder Forum
575 Madison
Avenue, New York, New York 10022
Telephone:
212-605-0335
Email:
gl@shareholderforum.com
|