BUSINESS
NEWS
JUNE 19, 2019 / 1:08 AM
Wall Street takes on
long-term care payouts as insurers balk at costs
David French
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Some
U.S. insurers are turning to Wall Street’s financial wizards for relief
from the liabilities of their long-term care (LTC) policies, posing a
challenge for regulators worried about how new industry players will
tackle the risks involved.
FILE PHOTO: A street sign is seen in
front of the New York Stock Exchange on Wall Street in New York,
February 10, 2009. REUTERS/Eric Thayer |
These policies help support
the provision of care to those unable to handle everyday tasks, such as
bathing and cooking, by funding assisted living or nursing home
arrangements. Many have become financially toxic for insurers, because of
soaring healthcare costs and rising lifespans.
A few investment firms are
willing to take on these LTC contracts, betting they can invest the
premiums from the policies to generate strong enough returns to cover the
payouts, and even turn a tidy profit.
While these transactions
promise financial relief to insurers, they are not without risk. The LTC
liabilities can be big enough to weigh on even conglomerates such as
General Electric Co. If the premiums from the assumed LTC contracts are
invested poorly, there may be insufficient money to cover the payouts,
industry experts say.
“Some of those deals include
nontraditional actors, which we question with regard to their expertise
associated with the management of these liabilities, as well as the very
aggressive reserving and cash-flow assumptions,” said Anthony Beato, a
director at credit ratings agency Fitch Ratings.
Those at the forefront of
state insurance regulation paint a picture of the industry’s watchdogs
attempting to walk a fine line between the need to alleviate financial
pressure on insurers and policing risky deals.
“There is a trend toward
encouragement to make sure there is a functioning private LTC insurance
market to cope with the baby boomers’ needs,” Fred Andersen, chief life
actuary at Minnesota’s Department of Commerce, said of the general
regulatory attitude toward these deals.
At stake is the viability of
the LTC policies on which elderly and disabled people rely. Without
private insurance, they would be forced to pay for their own care or rely
on already-stretched state and federal programs such as Medicaid.
Around 12 million people in
the United States will need such assistance by the end of this decade,
according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This figure
is set to skyrocket as the number of retirees increases; Americans over 65
years old are projected to more than double to 98 million by 2060.
The LTC market has already
shrunk because of the financial strain facing insurers. Fewer than 70,000
new LTC policies were written in the United States in 2017, down from
372,000 in 2004, according to the most recent data from the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). The average annual LTC
policy premium rose to $2,772 in 2015 from $1,677 in 2000, based on NAIC
data.
POLICIES
CHANGE HANDS
Two major LTC transactions
took place in the last 12 months, and insurance executives and dealmakers
say they expect more to happen this year.
Continental General
Insurance Company (CGIC), a subsidiary of hedge fund veteran Philip
Falcone’s HC2 Holdings Inc, completed the purchase of health insurer
Humana Inc’s $2.4 billion LTC business last August.
It was the second such deal
for CGIC, which also acquired the LTC business of American Financial Group
Inc in 2015.
In September, Wilton Re,
which is owned by the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, reinsured the
LTC policies of CNO Financial Group Inc. This meant that CNO continued to
administer the policies, but Wilton Re took over the investment of the
premiums and guaranteed the payouts.
Humana and CNO had to pay
the financial firms $203 million and $825 million, respectively, to get
the LTC portfolios off their books.
Analysts say such one-off
charges are better for insurers than allowing LTC policies to drain their
finances. Fitch said in a report last October that many U.S. insurers with
LTC portfolios would need to allocate at least 10% more cash to reserves
covering these policies in 2019.
Prudential Financial Inc and
Unum Group were among the insurance firms that announced in 2018 they
needed to commit extra cash to fund future LTC liabilities. One insurer,
Penn Treaty, collapsed in 2017 under the weight of its LTC obligations.
General Electric, which said
last year it would take a $6.2 billion after-tax charge and set aside a
further $15 billion in reserves to help cover its LTC liabilities, is also
looking for a buyer for its LTC portfolio, Reuters has reported.
RISKY BETS
CNO’s first attempt to seek
relief from its LTC portfolio soured in 2016 following a reinsurance deal
with Beechwood Re, which was founded by two Wall Street veterans.
Beechwood subsequently
collapsed after investing some of the policy premiums in Platinum
Partners, a hedge fund that folded due to its risky bets and whose top
executives were indicted in a U.S. federal fraud probe in December 2016.
As a result, CNO was forced
to reabsorb the $550 million LTC portfolio and take a $53 million
after-tax charge.
U.S. state regulators tasked
with averting such failed deals are generally more focused on the reserves
the investment firms set aside, rather than how they invest the premiums
from the LTC policies, said Ann Frohman, founder of Frohman Law Office and
a former head of Nebraska’s Department of Insurance.
“In addition to current
requirements, one area of improvement would be having all states require
the stress-testing of investment assumptions on LTC portfolios against
financial crisis-type economic conditions,” Frohman said.
Some firms taking on the LTC
portfolios also invest in junk-rated corporate credit, which is more
susceptible to losses during an economic downturn, according to Fitch’s
Beato.
Wilton Re declined to
comment on how it invests LTC policy premiums, while a CGIC spokesman said
it focuses on generating higher yields from investment-grade assets.
Even if some insurers do not
place risky investment bets, regulators say they also have to watch out
for firms seeking to avoid paying out some claims to boost their
profitability.
“That is always a concern,”
said Pennsylvania’s insurance commissioner, Jessica Altman.
Reporting by David French in New
York; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Matthew Lewis
© 2019 Reuters. |