MANAGEMENT
|
OCTOBER 21, 2008
Executive Pay Curbs Go
Global
The movement to curb executive pay in the wake
of the financial crisis continued to gain momentum Monday, as Germany and
Sweden joined the list of nations putting limits on financiers' compensation
as part of efforts to rescue their banking systems.
At least six countries now have curbed pay, or are poised to do so. The
unprecedented global scope of these efforts could change pay practices
broadly as well as prompt top managers to move to unaffected companies.
Pay Pinch?
More
countries move to curb executive pay, at companies with
and without government rescues.
AUSTRALIA: Prime minister seeking executive-pay
rules for finance firms to discourage excessive
risk-taking; he will then propose the rules to the
international community.
FRANCE: Business leaders adopted code of
conduct that prevents 'golden parachute' exit payments
for failed executives.
GERMANY: Compensation for top executives at
banks tapping government bailout funds capped at
€500,000; bonuses, stock options and severance barred.
NETHERLANDS: Top executives of ING Groep NV
agreed to give up 2008 bonuses and limit severance if
dismissed in exchange for government financial
injection.
SWEDEN: Participating banks in proposed bailout
must agree with government to limit compensation for
'key executives.'
SWITZERLAND: UBS AG agreed as part of
recapitalization to use international best practices for
executive pay and government monitoring.
U.S.: Limits on corporate-tax deductions on
executive pay and 'golden parachutes.' Firms also must
recover awards based on inaccurate results and bar
incentives for 'unnecessary and excessive risks.'
U.K.: Government is taking board seats at two
big banks, permitting more oversight of pay practices;
regulator wants investment banks to drop pay practices
that may have encouraged risk-taking.
Source:
WSJ reporting |
|
|
|
Sweden unveiled a plan
that offers bank guarantees of $200 billion. Banks taking part must limit
key executives' compensation.
The German cabinet imposed a €500,000
($670,000) annual salary cap and other limits on top executives of banks
that receive capital injections or sell troubled assets under that nation's
rescue plan. The U.S. financial-industry bailout also limits compensation at
participating firms. Some predict that could lead to pay restrictions at
other U.S. companies.
One lightning rod is Wall Street executives
who walk away with big payouts from companies receiving government money,
despite the curbs. Peter Kraus, head of strategy at Merrill Lynch & Co.
since early September, is expected to leave the firm and pocket over $10
million under terms of his contract, say people familiar with the matter.
Mr. Kraus, who declined to comment through a Merrill spokesman, is not among
the executives included in the government compensation limits because his
post isn't among the company's top-five jobs.
The widespread moves to restrict compensation
reflect public outrage over outsized pay packages for executives who led
banks to big losses -- or bankruptcy proceedings. Governments need to impose
pay limits "to get popular buy-in for these bailouts," said Stephen Davis, a
senior fellow at Yale University School of Management's Millstein Center for
Corporate Governance and Performance.
The curbs range from sweeping to narrow. The
German plan is among the most restrictive. In addition to the salary limit
for top executives, it also bars bonuses, stock-option grants, severance
payments and option exercises at banks drawing government funds during the
bailout program, which could last through 2012. Banks that only tap credit
guarantees are exempt from the restrictions.
At the other extreme, Switzerland's
UBS AG agreed as part of a government recapitalization plan to use
international "best practices" for executive pay and accept government
monitoring.
The U.S. financial-rescue law falls somewhere
in between. For the five top executives at participating companies, the
Treasury Department is limiting corporate-tax deductions on executive pay
and "golden parachute" payments for departing executives, requiring certain
companies to recover awards to executives that were made based on inaccurate
results, and barring incentives given executives to take "unnecessary and
excessive risks."
"It's the first time in history that there
has been a spontaneous international effort to rein in executive pay," said
Ira Kay, head of executive-compensation consulting at Watson Wyatt Worldwide
in New York.
But it is unclear which, if any, of the
approaches will be effective at curbing compensation. Past efforts in the
U.S. generally haven't slowed the rise of executive pay but instead shifted
the way top managers are rewarded. Executives outside the U.S. typically
make less, but experts say that is due more to historical and cultural
factors than government rules.
One skeptic is Anne Simpson, executive
director of the International Corporate Governance Network, a London group
representing more than 500 institutional investors in 40 countries.
Government pay curbs for bailed-out concerns "might throw some sand in the
cogs" temporarily but won't fix what Ms. Simpson considers a bigger problem:
the lack of accountability of corporate boards.
There are some indications of a broader shift
in attitudes. Some executives in several countries are voluntarily limiting
pay, even when not required by the new rules.
Deutsche Bank AG said its 10 top executives will forgo 2008 bonuses,
even though Germany's biggest bank doesn't plan to accept government cash.
The ousted chief executive of French-Belgian municipal lender
Dexia SA renounced his €3.7 million "golden parachute." Robert
Willumstad, replaced last month as CEO of
American International Group Inc. as part of a U.S. government rescue,
later said he won't accept his $22 million severance payment.
The hastily imposed limits included in
bailout measures likely portend more sweeping efforts to control pay by
lawmakers and shareholders next year. In the U.S., both major-party
presidential candidates, Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama, support
giving shareholders an annual nonbinding vote on compensation of top
executives; a bill requiring such votes passed the House of Representatives
last year, but wasn't voted on in the Senate. The U.K. and Australia are
among countries that already require such votes.
In Congress, key Democratic members, who
likely will retain control of the body, have also signaled interest in
broader measures. The bailout law "creates the floor for executive pay and
governance-reform packages" in Congress next year, suggested Richard
Ferlauto, head of corporate governance and pension investment at the
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. George Paulin,
CEO of Frederic W. Cook & Co., a compensation consulting firm in New York,
predicts such a bill could include curbs on deferred compensation.
Officials in the U.K. and Australia already
are trying to restrict compensation at companies unaffected by government
bailouts. Britain's markets regulator sent chief executives of investment
banks a sternly worded letter last week urging their boards to drop pay
practices that may have encouraged risky behavior -- and vowing checks to
make sure such "bad practices" disappear. Australian Prime Minister Kevin
Rudd said last week his government will create new executive-pay rules that
discourage excessive risk-taking in the financial sector. Mr. Rudd will then
propose the rules to the international community.
Executive pay was a hot-button issue in
Germany even before the bank-rescue package; some politicians in recent
months have called for mandatory caps across all industries. Last week,
Economy Minister Michael Glos urged other high-paid bankers to follow
Deutsche Bank's example of a voluntary pullback. Mr. Glos's request remains
unheeded so far.
Some argue that the evolving pay curbs could
make it harder for some affected financial institutions to attract and
retain managers. Marco Cabras, a spokesman for DSW, a German
shareholder-rights group, said that country's strict pay limits could
persuade some managers to move to other industries.
"Why would anyone who is an A player want to
come into an institution with all kinds of [pay] restrictions?" asked Thomas
Neff, chairman of U.S. operations at Spencer Stuart, an executive-search
firm in New York. Espen Eckbo, a professor at Dartmouth College's Tuck
School of Business, said some German finance managers may gravitate toward
private buyout firms, where pay won't be limited.
At the same time, the spreading clampdown on
executive pay may increase the number of finance professionals seeking work
in developing countries without banking bailouts, where recruiters say
opportunities still abound. The market for financial jobs hasn't been hurt
as badly in those nations as in New York and other U.S. financial hubs.
—Rachel Pannett and
David Gauthier-Villars contributed to this article.
Write to Joann S. Lublin at
joann.lublin@wsj.com and
Mike Esterl at mike.esterl@wsj.com
Copyright 2008 Dow Jones &
Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
|