Sun Microsystems
shareholders approved an advisory "say on pay" resolution at their annual
meeting Wednesday, joining a small but growing national movement for
increased corporate accountability to investors.
After rejecting two similar proposals in
recent years, about 67 percent of Sun shareholders agreed this time to ask
the company's board to let shareholders have an annual advisory vote on the
compensation awarded to top executives. About 32 percent of voting
shareholders opposed the measure.
The result was a defeat of sorts for Sun's
board, which had recommended a no vote on grounds that the company already
considers other forms of feedback from investors. It came at a meeting where
several stockholders also complained about the sharp decline in Sun's share
price over the last year.
Sun has struggled in the economic downturn,
posting a $1.67 billion loss in its last quarter after taking a significant
write-down on the value of past acquisitions. Chief Executive Jonathan
Schwartz acknowledged the company is in a "tough" economic environment but
told shareholders that Sun is positioned for long-term growth.
Proponents of the "say on pay" measure said
it was not meant as a specific commentary on Sun's current pay structure,
although they criticized the board in a written statement for compensating
Schwartz for personal aircraft use and installing a home security system.
Sun reported that Schwartz received more than $7.7 million in total
compensation for its last fiscal year, but said he received only about half
of his potential bonus because of Sun's poor performance in the second half
of the year.
Apple shareholders approved a similar measure
in March, while Oracle investors rejected another proposal last month. Sun's
resolution was proposed by Connecticut state Treasurer Denise Nappier, who
has introduced similar measures at other companies in which she has invested
on behalf of her state employees' retirement plan.
This
Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with
investor interests relating to shareholder advisory voting on
executive compensation, referred to by activists as "Say on
Pay." As stated in the
posted
Conditions of Participation, the
Forum's purpose is to
provide decision-makers with access to information and a free
exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's
Forum Summary. Each
participant is expected to make independent use of information
obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of
other participants. It is a Forum rule that participants
will not be identified or quoted without their explicit
permission.
The
organization of this Forum program was supported by
Sibson Consultingto
address issues relevant to broad
public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor
decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may
therefore invite program support of several companies that can
provide both expertise and examples of performance leadership
relating to the issues being addressed.
Inquiries about this Forum
program and requests to be included in its distribution list may
be addressed to
sop@shareholderforum.com.
The information
provided to Forum participants is intended for their
private reference, and permission has not been
granted for the republishing of any copyrighted
material. The material presented on this web site is
the responsibility of
Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder
Forum.