The Shareholder ForumTM

reconsidering

"Say on Pay" Proposals

Forum Home Page

"Say on Pay" Home Page

Program Reference

 

For the referenced report and Apple's public response, see

For a related report concerning the company's human errors relating to options pricing, see

 

Mercury News, April 28, 2009 article

 

Apple shareholders to get 'say on pay'

 

Updated: 04/27/2009 10:50:05 PM PDT

Apple shareholders will be getting a "say on pay."

Beginning next year, the company will allow investors to have an annual advisory vote on its executive pay packages, Apple said Monday in a statement.

Apple had urged shareholders to vote against "say on pay" at its annual meeting in February. It argued that Congress is likely to impose a "say on pay" policy for all public companies and that Apple should wait to implement those new rules.

But Monday the company promised to allow investors an advisory vote on executive pay no matter what Congress does.

The decision followed an inquiry by the Mercury News last week into how Apple counted shareholder votes on the "say on pay" proposal.

Apple reported at its annual meeting and in its quarterly report filed last week that shareholders had voted down the proposal. But vote tallies released by Apple in its quarterly report showed that 52 percent of shareholders who took a stand on the measure supported "say on pay." That was a higher portion of the vote than "say on pay" got in 2008, when Apple reported that the measure passed.

The Mercury News reported the discrepancy on its SiliconBeat.com blog Friday.

In the statement, Apple acknowledged that it had miscalculated shareholder votes on the "say on pay" and other investor-backed proposals. Due to "human error," the company said it counted abstentions as "no" votes, and thus mistakenly reported the measure lost.

"Say on pay'' had gained the support of investors owning large numbers of shares at each of Apple's last three annual meetings. But until Monday, the company had generally declined to comment on the votes.

Giving shareholders a vote on executive compensation matters has been picking up steam nationwide in response to the massive growth in executive pay over the past 20 years and a number enormous pay packages at particular public companies.

At Apple, support for "say on pay'' gained momentum in the wake of the company's options scandal, in which the company admitted to backdating thousands of options grants earlier this decade.

Contact Troy Wolverton at twolverton@mercurynews.com or 408-920-5021.

 

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests relating to shareholder advisory voting on executive compensation, referred to by activists as "Say on Pay." As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

The organization of this Forum program was supported by Sibson Consulting to address issues relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of performance leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to sop@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.