The Shareholder ForumTM

reconsidering

"Say on Pay" Proposals

Forum Home Page

"Say on Pay" Home Page

Program Reference

 

TheCorporateCounsel.net, May 26, 2010 article

 

 

 

TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog

The Practical Corporate & Securities Law Blog

Broc Romanek and Dave Lynn are Editors of TheCorporateCounsel.net

 

May 26, 2010

Say-On-Pay So Far: Wow! A Third Company Fails to Gain Majority Support

As noted in the ISS Blog, KeyCorp became the third company to fail to obtain majority support for its executive pay package at its annual meeting last Friday. The pay package received only 45% support - it received 87% support last year. Here's the company's Form 8-K with the voting results.

So KeyCorp joins Motorola and Occidental Petroleum as the first three US companies whose management say-on-pay ballot items didn't pass. Wow.

Consider the magnitude of this development:

- These three companies are not Wall Street banks where the general public is angry over banker bonuses.

- There were no organized campaigns against the pay packages at these three companies. This was a pure grass roots movement. With organized campaigns, imagine the level of votes.

- Only a few hundred companies have say-on-pay on their ballot this year; a small fraction of the 10,000 that will have it on their ballot next year when Congress makes it mandatory.

- If the Senate provision remains in the final bill changing NYSE Rule 452, say-on-pay will become a "nonroutine" agenda item - and broker nonvotes won't be available to be cast in favor of pay packages. This means it will become harder to obtain majority support for executive pay packages.

***

- Broc Romanek

Posted by broc at 7:44 AM
 

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests relating to shareholder advisory voting on executive compensation, referred to by activists as "Say on Pay." As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

The organization of this Forum program was supported by Sibson Consulting to address issues relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of performance leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to sop@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.