Forum Report: TDS
Management Choice of Adversary Response to
Shareholder Interests
A letter was received yesterday from the prominent Delaware corporate
litigation lawyer, A.
Gilchrest Sparks, III, of Morris
Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, indicating that he has been engaged by
TDS for a defense of management's refusal to provide the information
required by shareholders.
Stating that he is responding "on behalf of the Company, with the
concurrence of the members of the Audit Committee,"
he repeats management's previously reported
position that the Forum's demand for records did not comply with
unspecified "statutory requirements" of
Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, enforcement of
which would require proceedings in the state court where he practices.
As many of you know, it is unusual for a company's management to engage
litigation counsel to represent them in communications prior to the
initiation of any legal action requiring defense. It is also unusual
for them to refuse to specify what statutory requirements might require
attention to satisfy investor information requirements. We must
consider the possibility that this conduct is intended to discourage
investor efforts to exercise their rights by imposing on them the burden
of formal enforcement processes. In any event, it must be assumed
that
(a) management will be aggressively adversarial in its
responses to investor interests, and
(b) the "independent" members of the Audit Committee
will not act to require management's respect of investor interests.
We will of course be developing Forum plans to address the
recently summarized alternatives in this
context. Your comments will be appreciated.
GL – July 30, 2009
Gary Lutin
Lutin & Company
575 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-605-0335
Email: gl@shareholderforum.com
See the July 28, 2009 letter of A.
Gilchrest Sparks III of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP on behalf
of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
(1 page, 27 KB, in
PDF
format), and the responding July 29,
2009 letter of Gary Lutin on behalf of the Shareholder Forum
(1 page,
44 KB, in
PDF
format).
[2] As
previously reported, Forum
communications relating to the shareholder information requirements
had been referred to the Audit Committee for its review of management
compliance with company codes of conduct. There was
no other response from the Audit
Committee.
|