|
Exchange of Lawyers' Letters Regarding Delegate's Demands for Information Needed Before Annual Meeting (February 3-9, 2004) On February 2, 2004, in the absence of any response to the shareholder Delegate's January 29, 2004 letter reiterating his January 12, 2004 demand for information, the law firm representing shareholder interests, Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow LLP, sent a letter to the law firm representing the management of Farmer Bros. Co., Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, asking for immediate advice of the company's intention to satisfy its obligation to provide the information according to applicable California law. It was noted that the Delegate's demand had explicitly sought information needed for investor decisions concerning matters to be presented for voting at the annual meeting of shareholders, which the company had scheduled for February 23, 2004. The company's attorney answered in a letter dated the next day, February 3, 2004, promising a "substantive response" on Friday, February 6. The promised letter was transmitted to the Delegate after the close of business on February 6, stating that the company intended to attach some of the relevant documents to the company's next public report of quarterly results, and that the remaining information was "material" but would be provided only subject to confidentiality restrictions. Copies of both the February 3 and February 6, 2004 letters are available from the link below. The Delegate's lawyer sent a reply the next business day, February 9, 2004, insisting on substantive statements about what would be provided, and when. The company was also asked to explain its intended restriction of information that the company itself considers "material" to investors, and its failure to publicly report that information. The text of this letter is copied below, beneath the link for the letters to which it replies.
|
|