Financial Times, January 28, 2025, article: "Exxon foe Engine No. 1 to build fossil fuel plants with Chevron" [Activism champion jumps to "reindustrialization" bandwagon']

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum reference:

 Activism champion jumps to "reindustrialization" bandwagon


For past Forum attention to the fund manager whose activities are reported below, see

 

Source: Financial Times, January 28, 2025, article

Energy sector

Exxon foe Engine No. 1 to build fossil fuel plants with Chevron

Fund that won famous Wall Street proxy war over oil major’s climate stance now backs natural gas to power AI

Engine No. 1 says it is forming a joint venture with Chevron and agreed to a partnership with energy company GE Vernova to develop natural gas power plants © Bloomberg

Jamie Smyth in New York   JANUARY 28, 2025


Engine No. 1, the hedge fund that bested ExxonMobil in a fight over its approach to climate change, is teaming up with the supermajor’s rival Chevron to build fossil fuel plants to meet soaring artificial intelligence-driven power demand.

The former activist investor said on Tuesday it was forming a joint venture with Chevron and agreed to a partnership with energy company GE Vernova to develop natural gas power plants under a fast-track timeline.

The venture comes four years after Engine No. 1 launched one of Wall Street’s most audacious proxy wars against Exxon, arguing that the oil major faced an “existential business risk” by pinning its future to fossil fuels.

At the time the hedge fund claimed Exxon had not adequately considered that oil and gas demand could decline, saying the producer lacked a “credible plan to protect value in an energy transition”.

Although it held only 0.2 per cent of Exxon’s shares, Engine No. 1 won three seats on its board in a victory that sent shockwaves across corporate America and became the emblematic victory of the environmental, social and governance movement.

Chris James, Engine No. 1’s founder and chief investment officer, said the investment with Chevron was consistent with its previous Exxon campaign.

“This is not a pivot. The Exxon campaign was focused on governance and capital allocation as a way to create value for shareholders. It was not about ideology or fossil fuels or renewables,” James told the Financial Times.

“This partnership with Chevron and GE is about allocating capital in an economy that is undergoing a re-industrialisation and needs dramatically more power . . . This will lead to value creation for shareholders.”

The companies plan to co-locate power plants with data centres and deliver up to four gigawatts of electricity — enough to power up to 3.5mn homes — by 2027.

The investment, which analysts estimate at up to $8bn, is part of a race by energy companies to capitalise on surging power demand forecasts linked to the rollout of AI data centres.

“This is the beginning of these AI wars,” James said, referring to the race between China and the US to harness a technology its boosters believe will transform the global economy.

“We all know that China has an enormous amount of power available. But if we are really going to do a digital re-industrialisation of the US we’re going to need to make these investments at scale,” James said.

Engine No. 1’s decision comes as Wall Street and large businesses across the US beat a steady retreat from ESG and other progressive programmes that have drawn fire from President Donald Trump and Republicans.

James, a hedge fund industry veteran who made a fortune as a technology and biotech investor, has taken Engine Number 1 in a different direction since the Exxon campaign. In 2023 he announced the hedge fund would put $780mn into the base metals business of Brazilian miner Vale and told the FT that he never considered himself an activist investor.

“I consider myself an investor and activism is a tool of last resort, not a strategy,” he said.

The investors said they expected the gas plants to be designed with the flexibility to integrate carbon capture and storage — a technology that has yet to achieve full commercial and technical feasibility.

The gas plant joint venture also marks a strategic shift for Chevron, which is entering the electricity business a few months after Exxon also declared plans to build gas power plants to fuel AI data centres.

The announcement on Tuesday came a day after tech stocks slumped on news that China had developed a cheaper AI model that could need far less power than Silicon Valley’s energy- intensive AI systems.

“We still see the growth in electricity demand being significant, just in the rest of this decade, not to mention past it,” said Jeff Gustavson, president of Chevron New Energies.

“AI will be the big driver, but there are other drivers: reshoring of US manufacturing and just overall electrification in the pursuit of a lower carbon energy future.”

Exxon also declared plans to build gas power plants to fuel AI data centres.

 

Recommended



Exxon nemesis Engine No. 1 drops activism in hunt for new identity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025. All rights reserved.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.