Dell Settles Into Its Post-Public Persona
Dell
held its second annual analyst conference this week in Austin, and all
the cadres were on hand, the major firms like IDC,
Gartner, and Forrester, and
many smaller firms and independents. You might well ask, why bother,
since the stock is no longer traded and hasn’t been for a year and a
half? The answer would be, the company still needs to maintain a
conversation with the community, keeping it up to date on how things
are going.
It’s just that the makeup of the community is different
now. Gone, the days of pleasing Wall Street. Hello, customer base;
you know, the folks who pay the rent. And suppliers and partners who
provide components for and help put together the increasingly complex
and layered solutions Dell has on offer. And people like us, the tech
analysts who have covered the company for years and can put its
current trajectory in perspective.
Dell is behaving differently these days. It can invest
for the long haul to solve customer problems, taking less profit in
certain situations without having to explain itself to hungry
“investors.” In an environment of relative calm, employees can take
the long view, concentrate on customer needs, and execute cleanly.
The four types of capital that
Dell applies to practical innovation
|
So, how is the company doing, freed as it is from its
bonds? (Well, actually, it still has some bonds, just no publicly
traded equity.)
Michael Dell, who owns 75% of
the stock (Silver Lake Partners owns the rest), says the company is
now able to maintain a higher risk profile and move more quickly. At
a reception, one of the managers recounted a story about asking him
permission to invest in a particular business and having him say, “Let
me ask my board of directors, management committee, and attorneys ….
sure, go ahead.”
Some of the analysts at the event noted that being
private doesn’t in itself lead to a higher risk profile. Those of us
who have worked at IDG, the private tech analyst and publishing firm,
know just how conservatively run that company is from an investment
perspective. Almost no business can be stood up without having its
own revenue stream already in place. Be that as it may, a private
company at least has the flexibility to consider a more aggressive
stance, and Dell has chosen to use its streamlined governance to
create a lighter-weight, more proactive organization, one more
responsive to its customers.
The presentation by CFO Tom Sweet was a bit surreal.
There were lots of metrics, but they all had immeasurable variables
associated with them. Revenue grew in the “mid-single digits” on an
unknown base. Operating income grew at a rate that was “exponential
above that.” I think it’s safe to say the company is making money,
particularly since one of the few concrete things Sweet did mention
was that it has already paid down $3.4 billion of its debt from the
management buyout. Clearly, something is working. At the rate this
is going, Michael Dell is going to be able to settle all the debt, buy
out Silver Lake, and hang onto the entire company free and clear.
Speakers and panelists at the conference bandied about
the tired buzzwords “innovation” and “solutions” a fair bit. But
there was grumbling in the hallways during breaks that the company
still has a relatively light software portfolio compared to rivals
like
IBM and
Hewlett-Packard, and most of
its solutions are heavy on elements contributed by third parties.
Probably the best spokesman for the company in this domain was Neil
Hand, who, as the vice president of Client Product Innovation, has one
of the buzzwords in his title. Hand, a hardware guy at heart, talked
about sexier materials and designs in the lineup, but he was clear
that “[Dell’s] primary role is integrating the innovations of
others,” In other words, Dell mostly provides the “glue” for elements
developed by partners. He gave as examples Samsung in OLED displays,
Sharp in “infinity edge”
displays,
Microsoft for custom coding,
and
Intel for power optimization.
Dell maintains a range of technology sources, including
straight-up suppliers, companies in which Dell has made an equity
investment, and outright acquisitions. But I did talk with some of
the software product people, who made a good case that there is plenty
of decent, home-grown development going on at the company. In
particular, John Thomson, general manager of Advanced Analytics, made
a solid case that Dell is leading in some areas of development. He
has been working with three acquisitions whose products are now well
bonded together with the local glue. Statistica, the new name for
StatSoft, an advanced analytics company Dell purchased in March 2014,
provides a platform that, after chewing on multiple complex data
sources, returns a probability factor that can be used to drive alerts
and other events. Boomi, an earlier acquisition, is a cloud-based
system that helps integrate those data sources for Statistica. And
Toad, also an acquisition, is used to manage (e.g., spin up and down,
copy, secure) some of the databases used by Statistica. I saw a fine
demo showing how all three have been integrated to predict hospital
admissions for asthma based on elements like patient history, weather,
pollen type and count, and a dozen other variables, including changes
in those variables over time.
Probably the most powerful case that Dell really does
have an creative engine was made by a panel called Practical
Innovation at Dell, which featured four managers with distinct but
interlocking roles. Jim Lussier, managing director of Dell Ventures,
represented financial capital; Jai Menon, chief research officer of
Dell Research, spoke for technology capital; Joyce Mullen, vice
president and general manager of Dell Global OEM Solutions, stood in
for partnership capital; and Elizabeth Gore, Dell’s
Entrepreneur-in-Residence, was the voice of human capital.
Lussier’s $300 million fund makes investments averaging
$3-5 million in companies identified as potentially disruptive and has
bought 25 such firms. He looks for “massive market opportunities” and
“passionate teams.” Gore’s expertise in the startup world makes her
an expert on what constitutes a passionate team. Menon tries to stay
ahead of developing technology trends, swinging organizational
attention toward promising areas. And Mullen manages the alliances
and partnerships that do joint engineering and get products to
market. Among them, they optimize Dell’s technology investments so as
to produce new products and solutions that customers actually want.
The company doesn’t do a lot of green-field R&D. Much of it starts
with a market need and works backward to figure out a way to address
that need.
Michael Dell himself presided over the event, giving
the opening speech and circulating at one of the receptions.
Recalling his earlier days, he has returned to wearing glasses, which
give him an intellectual look. His sideburns have grayed a bit more
in the past year. He was loose-limbed and relaxed and yet full of
energy. He timed the management buyout perfectly and is now
concentrating on turning the company with his name on the door into a
well-honed machine. No wonder he was in such fine spirits.
Disclosure: Endpoint has a consulting relationship with
Dell.
|