Encouraging
Practical Resolution of Dell Investor Information Requirements
Dell
responded this afternoon to the Shareholder Forum’s demands for
information with another letter that carefully explains their lawyer’s
views of the deficiencies of the statements presenting the demands. I
have replied with a letter [the text of which is copied
below] offering to revise the statements to
accommodate those views, but encouraging instead a collaborative
discussion of practical processes to simply provide the information
that investors will need to make their own decisions about the
company’s buyout proposal.
Copies of
both letters have been posted on the Forum’s website:
-
March 15, 2013 letter from Janet B. Wright, Vice President –
Corporate, Securities & Finance Counsel of Dell Inc., to Gary Lutin
of The Shareholder Forum, re: First Supplemental Demand for Records
(4 pages, 334 KB, in
PDF format)
-
March 15,
2013 letter from Gary Lutin of The Shareholder Forum to Janet B.
Wright of Dell Inc., re: Demands for records, with referenced Forum
Report (1 page letter, 2 page
report, 84 KB, in
PDF format)
I will of
course continue to report the progress of communications with Dell.
GL – March 15, 2013
Gary Lutin
Chairman, The Shareholder Forum
575 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-605-0335
Email:
gl@shareholderforum.com
[letterhead of The Shareholder Forum]
March 15, 2013
By email
Ms. Janet B. Wright
Vice President – Corporate,
Securities & Finance Counsel
Dell Inc.
One Dell Way, RR1-33
Round Rock, Texas 78682
Re:
Demands for records
Dear Ms. Wright:
Thank you very much for this afternoon’s letter explaining your
specific perceptions of deficiencies in the statements of demands.
If you wish, I will be pleased to accommodate your views in a
revised statement of the demands that eliminates the concerns you
listed. I would prefer, though, to simply discuss a practical
process for responding to the information requirements of
investors who need to make their own decisions about what your
company and its board’s special committee are proposing. The
accompanying copy of a report distributed to Forum participants
this morning may help you understand the type of process that is
being considered, minimizing the burdens to all parties by
allowing agents who are subject to confidentiality obligations to
review information as a basis for providing non-confidential
reports that investors can use in their decisions. As you will
see, the report invites the advice of Forum participants to refine
the process, and I will naturally also welcome your advice.
I will in any event try to think of a way to satisfy your view of
the technical requirements of Section 220 by some more convenient
process than making a separate demand for each Dell stockholder
that asks the Forum to act as its “Delegate.”
Sincerely yours,
/s
Gary Lutin
cc: S. Mark Hurd, Esquire
William D. Regner, Esquire
Gregory P. Williams, Esquire
|
Attached:
|
|