Shareholder Forum for Options Policies

Forum Home Page

Options Policies Home Page

Program Reference

 

Financial Times, January 19, 2007 article

 

 
Why activists have to shout louder in Europe

By Paul Betts

Published: January 19 2007 02:00 | Last updated: January 19 2007 02:00

 

The power of shareholders over boards and managements can be measured in direct proportion to the noise they make. In other words, the more power they exercise, the less they shout in public to make their views and influence felt.

A recent study by European Corporate Governance Institute experts confirms this thesis and shows how hedge funds and other activist shareholders in the UK are far quieter than their US and continental European counterparts.

UK law gives far greater powers to shareholders to influence company boards than similar legislation in the US and other European countries - notably the Netherlands, whose corporate governance rules and legislation have turned it into one of the world's most board-friendly countries.

Shareholder activism has been particularly effective in the UK without causing all the public cacophony found in the US or some European countries because of the "nuclear deterrent" available to shareholders. Simply put, UK shareholders can call extraordinary meetings with 10 per cent of the voting share capital and put forward propositions to remove any and all directors if more than 50 per cent of votes cast favour the resolution.

With activist funds often able to muster enough votes to topple the board, directors and shareholders have tended to resolve their differences in private. The ECGI study focused on the Hermes UK fund and found that it had succeeded in securing its desired outcomes in the majority of cases. In most cases, the fund's engagement with the companies was conducted through behind the scene contacts with management, board members and other shareholders and far less at public shareholder meetings or other public channels.

This is in sharp contrast to the noise activist shareholders must make in the US where state of Delaware law and the might of corporate boards traditionally favour incumbent management. The same applies to continental Europe where the showdown at Stork in the Netherlands has shown the extremes activist funds will go to in their effort to press public and political opinion. Since the system is stacked against them, the only way to force change is by trying to secure the necessary political and government support.

The same applies to other European countries where big shareholding blocs, relationships and crony networks can still be put in place to frustrate activists. With hedge funds and other activist shareholders continuing to raise their voices - and the continuing debate about the value or shortcomings of shareholder activism - it is no surprise much of corporate Europe is now closing ranks to keep out the troublemakers.

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to all shareholders of the invited corporate participants, and to any fiduciaries or professionals concerned with the investment decisions of those shareholders, according to the posted Conditions of Participation.  The Forum's purpose is to provide shareholders with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their investment interests described in the Forum Summary As stated in the Conditions, all Forum participants are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program has been organized with the support of Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Ltd.  It is the first in an expected series that will be managed by a not-for-profit “Institute” to be established for the purpose of continuing the Forum programs conducted by Gary Lutin.

Inquiries and requests to be included in the Forum's distribution list may be addressed to op@shareholderforum.com.  The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material.

All material on this web site is published by Gary Lutin, who is responsible for conducting the Forum.