Shareholder Forum for Options Policies

Forum Home Page

Options Policies Home Page

Program Reference

Forum Summary

(October 27, 2006)

A “Forum” program is being initiated for shareholders of companies in relation to which options pricing and similar issues may be relevant to investors’ capital commitment and voting decisions.  Several companies will be invited to participate, in each case based on

  • the commitment of the board of directors to an open, cooperative exchange of views among the managers, investors and professionals concerned with developing economically practical policies suited to their company’s particular circumstances, and

  • the apparent significance of corporate value enhancement to be derived from aligning management rewards with the achievement of long-term performance objectives.

The intent of the Options Policies Forum is to facilitate a rational marketplace definition of adaptations that support a corporate participant’s fair competition for both management resources and capital.  For companies that must respond to recent discoveries of options backdating or similar reporting inaccuracies, the Forum objective will be to assure management’s  understanding of investor interests as a foundation for new policies that may be accepted without adversarial processes.  Specifically, if a corporate participant has received a shareholder proposal for proxy voting on options policies, such as those initiated in September 2006 by the Amalgamated Bank LongView Funds providing for the setting of pricing dates, the proponent shareholder will be encouraged to participate actively in the Forum’s cooperative process and to consider withdrawal of the proposal if management satisfactorily resolves investor interests.

The Forum will first address the development of general, broadly applicable principles which reflect a consensus of all key marketplace constituencies.  To guide this process, an Advisory Panel will be formed with representatives of invited corporate participants, leading investors, and recognized experts.  The process will include opportunities for publicly open exchanges of views, including an initial meeting to be scheduled in early December, and a final report will present the Advisory Panel’s conclusions together with any individual comments offered by its members by March 2007, in time for reference during that spring’s proxy season.

The Forum will also address company-specific issues for any corporate participant requesting its own “workshop.”  Each workshop will be organized separately in response to the particular needs for informal exchanges of views among managers, investors and professionals interested in the company’s resolution of issues.

The Forum will be open, free of charge, to all shareholders of the corporate participants and to any fiduciaries or professionals concerned with their investment decisions.  As stated in the “Conditions of Participation” which are publicly posted on the Forum web site, the Forum will be conducted for the purpose of providing shareholder participants with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their evaluations of alternatives.  All participants – including corporate and professional as well as investor – are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program is organized with the support of Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Ltd.  It is the first in an expected series that will be the responsibility of a not-for-profit “Institute” to be established for the purpose of continuing the Forum programs conducted by Gary Lutin.

Members of the Advisory Panel:

Amalgamated Bank/Longview Funds: Julie Gozan, Cornish F. Hitchcock

Association of BellTel Retirees: C. William Jones

Blue Harbour Group: David Silverman

Delaware Investments/Lincoln National: Kenneth Broad

Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond: Thomas J. Mackell, Jr.

Forbes: Vahan Janjigian

Hermes Equity Ownership Services: Bess Joffe, Paul Munn

Palmer Brennan; also NYSSA: Peter F. Brennan

Pfizer: Margaret M. Foran

Putnam Mutual Funds: John A. Hill

Reda & Associates: James F. Reda

Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren; also International Roundtable on Executive Remuneration: Keith L. Johnson

 

March 30, 2007 Forum Report

Advisory Panel Conclusions

Proposed Principles

Common interest

Corporations are organized for the essential purpose of governing the common interests of investors and managers in the competitive success of a business enterprise.  Although this purpose can be undermined by short-term financial, professional or political interests, most investors and managers will ultimately benefit from the fair sharing of economic risks and rewards associated with their enterprise.

Shareholder rights

Grants of management equity participation, whether in the form of stock options or any other interest that dilutes shareholder interests in their capital investment, can be authorized only with the fully informed consent of shareholders.

 

Guidance” relating to performance

The compensation risks and rewards a company’s management has accepted are a highly credible indication of the shareholder value objectives they expect to achieve.  Investors must therefore be able to understand the relevant conditions of management compensation, and particularly its relation to performance goals, as a basis for informed capital allocation and voting decisions.

 

 

Post-Program Application of Principles

For Advisory Panel members' guidance on professional research use of the new SEC-required compensation reports in securities analyses, see

October 25, 2007 Presentation of James F. Reda

to the

New York Society of Security Analysts:

"What Analysts Can Find in Compensation Reports"

and

March 27, 2008 Open Meeting of the Verizon Forum:

"Finding Out How Verizon Executives Are Placing

Their Bets"

For applications to investor communications, see

June 18, 2008 Forum Report:

Yale-Deloitte Report on Communications about

Executive Compensation

See also

June 25, 2008 Forum Report:

Initial Comments on Yale-Deloitte Report

and

August 11, 2008 comments:

Jane W. McCahon and Louis M. Thompson, Jr.

 

For further applications to the information exchanges required for investor decisions, including those relating to this program's 2006-2007 special project for "Advisory Voting" on executive compensation ("Say on Pay"), see the subsequent public interest programs:

 

"Say on Pay" Proposals (2008)

and

"E-Meetings" (2010)

(Electronic Participation in Shareholder Meetings)

 

 

 

News Reports

Forum Program


 

Agenda

July 7, 2008

"Divisions Grow Within Say-on-Pay Movement"

See new

Shareholder Forum

for Reconsidering

"Say on Pay" Proposals

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

June 22, 2008

"How Big a Payday for the Pay Consultants?"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

May 6, 2008

"Aflac Investors Get a Say on Executive Pay, a First for a U.S. Company"

and

April 6, 2008

"Say on Pay: A Whisper or a Shout for Shareholders?"

 

♦♦

 

Wall Street Journal

March 21, 2008

"(New Math) x (SEC Rules) + Proxy = Confusion | Firms Disclose Formulas Behind Executive Pay, Leaving Many Baffled"

 

♦♦

 

Financial Times

December 7, 2007

Lex: "Board-investor communication"

see also

Wall Street Journal

January 14, 2008

"Talk Therapy"

 

♦♦

 

Agenda

November 12, 2007

"U.K. Investors Warn U.S. About Say on Pay"

 

♦♦

 

TheCorporateCounsel.net

November 5, 2007

"Verizon's Say on Pay: A Take-Away"

and

New York Times

November 2, 2007

"Verizon to Put Executive Pay to Shareholder Vote"

 

♦♦

 

Investor Relations Magazine

September 13, 2007

(September 17 update)

"Interest grows in independent shareholder forums"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

June 17, 2007

"Hear Ye, Hear Ye: Corralling Executive Pay"

See also
Crain's New York Business

June 25, 2007

"Executive Pay Report | Slow start for say-on-pay push; Few shareholder proposals prevail; bull market to blame"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

May 26, 2007

EDITORIAL

"A Say on Executive Pay"

 

♦♦

 

Wall Street Journal

May 26, 2007

"Executive Pay - Next Skirmish Is at UnitedHealth"

See also Dow Jones Newswires

May 22, 2007

"UnitedHealth Holders Seek More Say On Governance"

and

May 23, 2007

"Proxy Services Differ On UnitedHealth; One Nixes Directors"

For voting results, see

St. Paul Pioneer Press

May 30, 2007

"Shareholders warn insurer"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

May 19, 2007

"Say-on-Pay Gets Support at Verizon"

See also

Wall Street Journal

May 19, 2007

"Verizon Holders Pass 'Say-on-Pay' Plan"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

May 4, 2007

"Verizon Vote on Pay Levels to Be Decided in a Recount"

See other May 4, 2007reports:

Financial Times

Wall Street Journal

Washington Post

See also

Fortune (The Browser)

April 27, 2007

"Proxy showdown: Verizon vs. retirees"

 

♦♦

 

Financial Times

April 20, 2007

"Hermes to push for vote on pay at UnitedHealth"

 

♦♦

 

Financial Times

April 1, 2007

"Why America’s boards face awkward times in the auditorium"

 

♦♦

 

Compliance Week

February 13, 2007

"Activists Have Sudden Outbreak Of Dialogue"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

January 21, 2007

"Roadblocks to Greater Say on Pay"

Subsequent New York Times reports:

March 6, 2007

 "AT&T Investors Will Have Their Say"

and

March 23, 2007

 "For AT&T’s Chief, a 94% Increase in Pay"

 

♦♦

 

Global Proxy Watch

January 19, 2007

"Watershed"

 

♦♦

 

New York Times

December 17, 2006

"A Sneak Preview of Proxy Battles"

 

♦♦

 

Global Proxy Watch

November 3, 2006

"Right Option"

 

♦♦

 

Financial Times

October 30, 2006

"Activist investors to probe backdating"

 

 

 

 

Related Issues


See articles relating to:

Advisory Voting

Compensation Issues

Global Practices

History of Options Practices

Information Requirements

Options Backdating

Regulatory Process

 


Recent

General Relevance

Fortune

June 26, 2008

"Who's watching the watchdogs?"

"A new study from Stanford University questions the reliability of corporate-governance ratings"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

June 2, 2008

"Turning the Tables:

RiskMetrics's Head Faces His Day

of Shareholder Judgment"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

March 28, 2008

"Do Stock Options Turn You Into A Bad Person?"

♦♦

Financial Times

March 26, 2008

FT REPORT - CORPORATE FINANCE 2008: FRONT PAGE

 "Gentlemen, please empty your pockets"

and

"Aflac shareholders vote on executive pay"

♦♦

Financial Times

March 8, 2008

"Wanted: ideas to head off a regulatory backlash"

and

New York Times

March 7, 2008

"Panel to Review Payouts Given by Troubled Firms"

See also

Wall Street Journal

March 8, 2008

"CEO Apologizes, but Not for Lender"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

March 7, 2008

"Say on the Boss's Pay | Aflac CEO Amos Bets on His Track Record as Insurer Becomes First U.S. Company to Hold Vote on Executive Compensation"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

February 27, 2008

"'Say on Pay' Gets a Push, But Will Boards Listen?"

♦♦

Investor Relations Magazine

February 2008

"The hunt is on"

♦♦

New York Times

December 9, 2007

"Sharper Claws for Recovering Executive Pay"

see also

Wall Street Journal

December 10, 2007

"Conflict Concerns Benefit Independent Pay Advisers"

♦♦

New York Times

December 6, 2007

"House Panel Finds Conflicts in Executive Pay Consulting"

♦♦

Financial Week

October 22, 2007

"Say-on-pay critics warn of problems | Proposed law could mean lawsuits galore, plus additional legislation, Oxley says"

♦♦

New York Times

October 13, 2007

"Pfizer’s Attempt at Financial Clarity Gets Blurred"

see also

New York Times

October 10, 2007

"S.E.C. Finds Fault on Pay Disclosures"

♦♦

Financial Times

October 7, 2007

"Disparity ‘sign of corporate malaise’"

see also

Financial Times

October 14, 2007

"We are overpaid, say US executives"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

August 31, 2007

"SEC Asks Firms to Detail Top Executives' Pay"

See also

Financial Times

September 4, 2007

"SEC's red-letter day for top pay miscreants"

and responding

Financial Times

September 7, 2007

"Providing a window into US exec compensation"

♦♦

ISS Corporate Governance Blog

August 2, 2007

"Analysis: Forces Fueling Engagement to Grow in 2008"

♦♦

Associated Press

July 18, 2007

"Pay Proposal Advocates Get New Allies"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

July 16, 2007

"Firms, Investors Trying More Talk, Less Acrimony"

♦♦

CFO Magazine

July 1, 2007

"Drowning in Data"

♦♦

Financial Times

June 27, 2007

"Call to cut quarterly guidance"

See also

Bloomberg

June 28, 2007

"Pfizer Will Start Meetings With Largest Investors"

♦♦

Financial Times

June 15, 2007

"Fund group offers say on executive pay"

♦♦

Forbes

June 4, 2007

"Stock Option Swings"

♦♦

New York Times

May 25, 2007

"More Than Ever, It Pays to Be the Top Executive"

♦♦

San Jose Mercury News

May 11, 2007

"Apple stock owners give CEO Jobs a slicing | Reform Proposals Get Strong Support"

♦♦

New York Times

May 11, 2007

"Panel to Look at Conflicts in Consulting"

See also

Wall Street Journal

May 14, 2007

"Boards Aim to Avoid Conflicts | Safeguards Are Imposed On Same Pay Consultant For Executives, Directors"

♦♦

Financial Times

May 3, 2007

"America frets about executive pay"

♦♦

TheStreet.com

May 1, 2007

"Pay-Fight Foes Blow Hot Air"

♦♦

Financial Times

April 30, 2007

"'Legal vicious circle' emerges"

♦♦

Financial Times

April 21, 2007

"Obama joins push on executive pay awards"

♦♦

Washington Post

April 11, 2007

"Morgan Stanley, Bank of N.Y. Investors Reject 'Say on Pay' | Activist Shareholders Encouraged by Vote Totals"

♦♦

New York Times

April 8, 2007

"Special Report: More Pieces. Still a Puzzle."

See also accompanying

"Transparency, Lost in the Fog"

and

"More Nuggets on Pay From Proxy Filings"

♦♦

Dow Jones Newswires

April 2, 2007

"Most Investment Pros Support Shareholder Vote On Pay - Survey"

♦♦

New York Times

March 31, 2007

"Intel Can Recover Bonuses It Shouldn’t Have Paid"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

March 21, 2007

 Review & Outlook

"CEOs and Their Millions"

♦♦

New York Times

March 11, 2007

"Weird and Weirder Numbers on Pay Reports"

See also

Los Angeles Times

March 16, 2007

"Sempra CEO's pay in fine print | The firm's disclosures on compensation lack clarity despite new rules to boost transparency"

and

Associated Press (as published by Forbes)

March 30, 2007

"Proxies Fall Short on Pay"

♦♦

New York Times

March 6, 2007

"AT&T Investors Will Have Their Say"

and

Financial Times

March 7, 2007

"AT&T forced to allow pay vote"

♦♦

Forbes

March 1, 2007

"CEOs Beware: Congress At Work"

♦♦

Associated Press (as published by Forbes)

February 27, 2007

"Q&A: Upside to Executive Pay Votes"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

February 26, 2007

"Shareholders Push For Vote on Executive Pay"

♦♦

Financial Times

February 26, 2007

"Whatever next: the US eyes up European models"

♦♦

Associated Press (as published by Forbes)

February 20, 2007

"Frank: Exec Pay Legislation Coming Soon"

♦♦

Washington Post

February 15, 2007

"Score One for Dissent | Aflac to Be 1st U.S. Firm to Allow Advisory Votes on Pay"

and

Financial Times

February 14, 2007

"Aflac investors get say in executive pay"

See also

New York Times

February 18, 2007

"Democracy in Action"

♦♦

Associated Press (as published by Forbes)

February 9, 2007

"Is This Year to Burst CEO Pay Balloon?"

♦♦

Global Proxy Watch

February 9, 2007

"Say on Pay"

♦♦

Financial Times

February 8, 2007

"Blue chips in talks on UK-style pay vote"

See also

January 26, 2007

"Push to curb executive pay"

♦♦

New York Times

January 7, 2007

"More $200 Million Parachutes? Don’t Be Shocked"

♦♦

Financial Times

January 5, 2007

"It pays to simplify boardroom compensation"

♦♦

New York Times

December 29, 2006

"Does S.E.C. Know What It Is Doing?"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

December 28, 2006

"SEC Reversal Irks a Committee Chief | Rep. Frank Shows Concern For Relaxed Disclosure Rule, Vows to Get Congress Involved"

See similar reports in

BusinessWeek

Financial Times

Washington Post

♦♦

New York Times

December 27, 2006

"S.E.C. Changes Reporting Rule on Bosses’ Pay"

♦♦

Wall Street Journal

December 27, 2006

"Open Spigot | Bosses' Pay: How Stock Options Became Part of the Problem Once Seen as a Reform, They Grew Into Font of Riches And System to Be Gamed | Reload, Reprice, Backdate"
 


 

Dedicated News Coverage

New York Times

(link to NYTimes.com web site - registration required)

Executive Pay: A Special Report

(2006-2007)

and

Times Topics: Executive Pay

(2007-2008)


Wall Street Journal

(links to WSJ.com web site - subscription required)

Perfect Payday & Options Scorecard

also

CEO Compensation Scorecard

(2007)

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to all shareholders of the invited corporate participants, and to any fiduciaries or professionals concerned with the investment decisions of those shareholders, according to the posted Conditions of Participation.  The Forum's purpose is to provide shareholders with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their investment interests described in the Forum Summary As stated in the Conditions, all Forum participants are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program has been organized with the support of Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Ltd.  It is the first in an expected series that will be managed by a not-for-profit “Institute” to be established for the purpose of continuing the Forum programs conducted by Gary Lutin.

Inquiries and requests to be included in the Forum's distribution list may be addressed to op@shareholderforum.com.  The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material.

All material on this web site is published by Gary Lutin, who is responsible for conducting the Forum.