Shareholder Forum for Options Policies

Forum Home Page

Options Policies Home Page

Program Reference

 

For reports of the article's referenced vote on a similar proposal submitted to Verizon shareholders, see

For additional information about the Forum's project relating to the development of a model for advisory voting on executive compensation policies, see

Advisory Voting

 

Dow Jones Newswires, May 23, 2007 article

 

The Wall Street Journal  

May 23, 2007 12:45 p.m. EDT

 
 

Qwest Shareholders Defeat Say-On-Pay Proposal >Q


DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
May 23, 2007 12:45 p.m.

 
   By Roger Cheng 
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES 
 

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Qwest Communications International Inc. (Q) shareholders on Wednesday handily voted down a proposal that would've given them more influence over how top managers are paid.

After a preliminary count, the Denver telecommunications company said that only 20% of votes cast supported the proposal.

The so-called "so-on-pay" measure has been a hot topic at annual shareholder meetings. Fellow Bell Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) said Friday that its shareholders had approved a similar proposal. The non-binding policy would've given shareholders an advisory vote on executive compensation, although companies aren't required to implement it.

A cadre of activist shareholders, institutional investors, and state and union pension funds have pushed the measure to a large number of companies. As a result, it's enjoyed surprisingly rapid acceptance for a proposal not supported by management.

The American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees proposed the measure to Qwest. It also had the backing the Association of U.S. West Retirees, which represents more than 40,000 Qwest retirees and surviving spouses.

In addition, proxy-advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis & Co. supported the proposal, while rival firm Proxy Governance sided with management's recommendation to reject it.

Shareholders also defeated proposals to more closely tie executive equity compensation to performance and separate the chief executive and chairman roles.

-By Roger Cheng, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-2020; roger.cheng@dowjones.com

 
  URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT_CO_20070523_711661.html

 
   
Copyright 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to all shareholders of the invited corporate participants, and to any fiduciaries or professionals concerned with the investment decisions of those shareholders, according to the posted Conditions of Participation.  The Forum's purpose is to provide shareholders with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their investment interests described in the Forum Summary As stated in the Conditions, all Forum participants are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program has been organized with the support of Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Ltd.  It is the first in an expected series that will be managed by a not-for-profit “Institute” to be established for the purpose of continuing the Forum programs conducted by Gary Lutin.

Inquiries and requests to be included in the Forum's distribution list may be addressed to op@shareholderforum.com.  The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material.

All material on this web site is published by Gary Lutin, who is responsible for conducting the Forum.