Reuters, February 19, 2025, article: "Exclusive: Vanguard pauses corporate meetings over new ESG guidance" [New policies discouraging professional shareholder engagement practices]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

New policies discouraging professional shareholder engagement practices

 

For evolving interests in the rights of individual investors to direct the shareholder voting of their investments, see

 

Source: Reuters, February 19, 2025, article


 

Exclusive: Vanguard pauses corporate meetings over new ESG guidance

By Ross Kerber

February 19, 20254:09 PM EST

 

 

The logo for Vanguard is displayed on a screen on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., June 1, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo

Feb 19 (Reuters) - Top mutual fund manager Vanguard has paused meetings with portfolio companies while it reviews the impact of new guidance on investor activism from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, according to people familiar with the matter.

In a recent notice, the SEC, the acting chair of which was appointed by President Donald Trump, revised its "beneficial ownership reporting" interpretations in ways that could put new burdens on firms like Vanguard that now rely on the SEC's Schedule 13G form to report major holdings.

Going forward, the SEC said managers may need to use the more complex Schedule 13D, which would increase their costs, if they pressure management on matters like climate questions or whether a company has a staggered board or poison pill takeover defenses.

Vanguard put the pause in place because it is "trying to process and understand the new guidelines so they can remain a 13G filer and not a 13D filer," said one of the sources, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Vanguard did not comment on the meetings. In a statement sent by a representative on Wednesday, the Pennsylvania-based firm said "We are analyzing the new guidance from SEC staff to determine what, if any, modifications to the Vanguard funds' passive approach to investment stewardship activities may be warranted.”

The company said it prioritizes transparency and that "we continue our commitment to working constructively with policymakers to address questions related to passive investing and proxy voting."

Ending the meetings could reduce the power of shareholder activists focused on environmental, social or governance questions, corporate attorneys say, the apparent goal of the SEC's current leadership. But it could also diminish the input that executives receive from top investors on more traditional corporate questions like executive pay.

Rival asset manager BlackRock had also paused meetings with some of its portfolio companies. A company representative did not immediately comment on the status of these meetings on Tuesday.

 

Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by Leslie Adler, Kirsten Donovan

Ross Kerber

Thomson Reuters

Ross Kerber is U.S. Sustainable Business Correspondent for Reuters News, a beat he created to cover investors’ growing concern for environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, and the response from executives and policymakers. Ross joined Reuters in 2009 after a decade at The Boston Globe and has written extensively on topics including proxy voting by the largest asset managers, the corporate response to social movements like Black Lives Matter, and the backlash to ESG efforts by conservative politicians. He writes the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance Newsletter....


 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.