Financial Times, November 18, 2024, article: "Vanguard says shareholders can vote for profits over ESG issues" [Evolving support and encouragement of investor rights to control their shareholder votes]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum reference:

 Evolving support and encouragement of investor rights to control their shareholder votes


For recent Forum attention to efforts of fund managers to address the interests of their investors in shareholder voting decisions as well as the associated political and administrative challenges, see the October 7, 2024, Forum Report: Inviting Proposed Methods to Support Shareholder Voting, and the following published articles:

 

Source: Financial Times, November 18, 2024, article

ESG investing

Vanguard says shareholders can vote for profits over ESG issues

Asset manager gives investors greater say on proxy votes as it tries to navigate backlash to ‘woke’ policies

Conservatives have accused Vanguard and other index fund managers of pushing leftwing politics on American companies © Bloomberg

Brooke Masters in New York   NOVEMBER 18 2024


Vanguard is giving retail shareholders the chance to vote in favour of putting profits above all else as it doubles the size of its experiment with letting more investors have a say on proxy votes.

Nearly 4mn people controlling up to $250bn in shares in US companies will now be able to choose one of five options, which also include letting Vanguard make the decision, voting with management, prioritising environmental, social and governance factors or in effect voting “present”.

The addition of a profits-above-politics option comes as Vanguard and other large asset managers try to navigate a conservative backlash against ESG without angering customers who remain committed to fighting climate change and social inequality.

“It’s a response to feedback from investors,” said John Galloway, Vanguard’s global investment stewardship officer. “Investors have different perspectives on what they believe maximises shareholder value.”

Vanguard, which has $10.1tn in assets, drew criticism from progressive campaigners earlier this year when it announced that it had voted against every single environmental and social proposal on US shareholder ballots this year. But it and other index fund managers remain in the crosshairs of conservatives who contend that money managers are using their large shareholdings to foist “woke capitalism” on American companies.

Eight Vanguard funds will participate in the voting choice programme in the coming proxy season, three more than in 2023-24, although they still do not include the company’s biggest funds, those that track the S&P 500 and the total US market.

The Pennsylvania-based fund manager said it was also working towards letting investors who own their shares through retirement accounts to participate, which would vastly expand the programme’s potential reach. Three times as many US investors own mutual funds through retirement accounts as through other means, according to the Investment Company Institute.

Vanguard’s big index fund rivals are also in the process of giving clients greater control over shareholder votes.

BlackRock’s Voting Choice programme started with institutional clients and added its first individual investors earlier this year. The owners of $2.8tn in equity assets are eligible to chose between letting BlackRock vote for them or 16 other policies. The owners of roughly one-quarter, or $634bn, have made a selection.

State Street Global Advisors' voting programme has 10 options, including letting SSGA make the choice and not voting, and it is available to $1.7tn in assets, including all of the group’s US-based index mutual funds that invest in American equities.

The effort to hand off responsibility comes at a time when BlackRock and Vanguard are in the crosshairs of regulators at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation because their index funds own such large stakes in many US banks. The FDIC is considering whether to require additional scrutiny when the fund managers hold 10 per cent or more of a lender. SSGA is part of the custody bank State Street and already subject to oversight by banking supervisors.

It is not clear whether the voting programmes will help get the fund managers off the hot seat. So far, nearly half of Vanguard investors who expressed a preference have told the fund company to use its best judgment and vote for them.


Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2024. All rights reserved.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.