Reuters, November 6, 2024, article: "Companies boost social and climate reporting amid ESG backlash" [Politics of addressing shareholder voting interests]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Politics of addressing shareholder voting interests

 

For evolving interests in the rights of individual investors to direct the shareholder voting of their investments, see

 

Source: Reuters, November 6, 2024, article


 

Climate & Energy  |  Securities Enforcement  |  US Elections  |  ESG Investors  |  Human Rights

 

Companies boost social and climate reporting amid ESG backlash

By Ross Kerber

November 6, 2024  4:54 PM EST

 

 

The One World Trade Center building stands amid the Manhattan skyline in New York City, U.S., July 26, 2023. REUTERS/Amr Alfiky/File Photo

 

   Summary     

  • Most S&P 500 companies disclose diversity data

  • LGBTQ+ survey responses at a record high

  • Lowe's, Ford to continue disclosures

Oct 31 (Reuters) - (This Oct. 31 story has been corrected to fix the spelling of the name 'Shiva Rajgopal' in paragraphs 3 and 5)

Many U.S. companies have stepped up reporting on environmental and social matters in recent years even with sustained pressure from conservative politicians, data reviewed by Reuters shows.

The trend shows the importance investors and regulators now place on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, analysts said, amid rapid global warming and shifting workforce demographics. Some political conservatives call the attention misplaced or worry the disclosures could give activists leverage to force companies to make unnecessary changes.

"Most ESG problems are business problems. I'm an accounting professor. I can tell you that if you pick any company's 10K and look at the risk factors, they are full of E and S problems," said Shiva Rajgopal, who teaches at Columbia Business School.

The data contrasts with a some high-profile cases where companies have dialed back ESG efforts such as working less with industry climate efforts and cooperating less with an LGBTQ+ advocacy group.

Many executives may be taking a wait-and-see approach until national elections on Nov. 5 set a new balance of power in Washington, D.C., starting next year, Rajgopal said.

"If you're a company and something is getting you into trouble with some constituents, it's simplest to back away from doing things that seem risky for now and just stay put and wait until January and then reassess," he said

Which party holds the White House and Congress could energize or squash efforts to restrict ESG investing, a cause that has lagged to date.

BE COUNTED

The share of S&P 500 companies making workforce data by race and gender public rose to 82.6% as of Sept. 1 from 5.3% in 2019, according to DiversIQ, which tracks diversity data for investors, consulting firms and corporate clients.

 

 

Lines show % of companies publicly disclosing data from their federal EEO-1 forms

 

The number of U.S. companies sharing environmental data, meanwhile, has also grown, with 85% of large-cap U.S. companies disclosing details of their greenhouse gas emissions at the end of last year, up from 54% disclosing in 2019, according to ESG investment advisor HIP Investor.

 

Chart shows the percentage of companies, by market capitalization, disclosing details of their Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions

 

Obtaining public disclosures on ESG data has been a focus of pro-ESG activist investors, including Democratic public pension officials. The disclosure uptick also shows boards responding to new rules like the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, said Ken Rivlin, partner at law firm A&O Shearman.

Many companies also made public commitments around climate, pay equity and workforce, details they cannot easily shift with the latest news cycle.

"Establishing corporate policy in reaction to the latest pro- or anti-ESG news story is not a recipe for success," Rivlin said.

KEEP THE REPORTS COMING

Various conservative politicians and social media figures have targeted companies' diversity efforts including their links to LGBTQ+ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign, which surveys companies on issues including same-sex partner benefits and transgender healthcare.

In August, home improvement retailer Lowe's, said it would no longer participate in the survey and restructured diversity efforts. A Lowe's representative said at the time it would continue to report workforce diversity and pay-gap data that investors had asked for.

A Ford representative said via email that "we will continue to disclose our human capital management and DEI data" in an annual sustainability report, but did not provide further details.

Despite the departures, more than 1,400 companies participated in this year's survey, to be released in January, up slightly from 1,384 in the most recent survey issued in November 2023, HRC said.

Companies "know that this is what their workforce and consumers demand," said HRC President Kelley Robinson.

Jeremy Tedesco, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which calls itself a Christian law firm and opposes many corporate ESG efforts, said pullbacks like those by Lowe's and Ford stand in contrast to several years ago when many companies rushed to align with climate and social-justice activists.

Successful lawsuits targeting corporate diversity policies based on the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on college admissions could accelerate corporate changes, Tedesco said. "Unfortunately companies went too far and there's a lot of course-correction," he said.

ON THE BACK FOOT

Many corporate climate disclosures stem from pressure from top fund firms backing shareholder resolutions. Since around 2021, however, investors have cut their support including State Street's asset-management arm.

Like other investors, State Street said companies have already made significant changes. "Disclosure has dramatically improved, especially related to E and S issues over the past five years," said Ben Colton, State Street's stewardship chief. "I'd imagine we'll continue to see this kind of disclosure," he said.

 

Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston. Additional reporting by Isla Binnie in New York. Editing by Simon Jessop in London and Anna Driver

Ross Kerber

Thomson Reuters

Ross Kerber is U.S. Sustainable Business Correspondent for Reuters News, a beat he created to cover investors’ growing concern for environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, and the response from executives and policymakers. Ross joined Reuters in 2009 after a decade at The Boston Globe and has written extensively on topics including proxy voting by the largest asset managers, the corporate response to social movements like Black Lives Matter, and the backlash to ESG efforts by conservative politicians. He writes the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance Newsletter....


 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.