Climate & Energy
|
Securities
Enforcement |
US Elections
|
ESG Investors
|
Human Rights
Companies boost social and climate
reporting amid ESG backlash
By
Ross Kerber
November 6, 2024 4:54 PM EST
The One World Trade Center building
stands amid the Manhattan skyline in New York City, U.S., July 26,
2023. REUTERS/Amr Alfiky/File Photo
|
Summary
-
Most S&P 500 companies disclose diversity
data
-
LGBTQ+ survey responses at a record high
-
Lowe's, Ford to continue disclosures
Oct 31 (Reuters) - (This Oct. 31 story has been corrected to fix the
spelling of the name 'Shiva Rajgopal' in paragraphs 3 and 5)
Many U.S. companies have stepped up reporting on environmental and
social matters in recent years even with sustained pressure from
conservative politicians, data reviewed by Reuters shows.
The trend shows the importance investors and regulators now place on
environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, analysts said, amid
rapid global warming and shifting workforce demographics. Some
political conservatives call the attention misplaced or worry the
disclosures could give activists leverage to force companies to make
unnecessary changes.
"Most ESG problems are business problems. I'm an accounting professor.
I can tell you that if you pick any company's 10K and look at the risk
factors, they are full of E and S problems," said Shiva Rajgopal, who
teaches at Columbia Business School.
The data contrasts with a some high-profile cases where companies have
dialed back ESG efforts such as working less with industry
climate efforts and
cooperating less with an LGBTQ+
advocacy group.
Many executives may be taking a wait-and-see approach until national
elections on Nov. 5 set a new balance of power in Washington, D.C.,
starting next year, Rajgopal said.
"If you're a company and something is getting you into trouble with
some constituents, it's simplest to back away from doing things that
seem risky for now and just stay put and wait until January and then
reassess," he said
Which party holds the White House and Congress could energize or
squash efforts to restrict ESG investing, a cause that has lagged
to date.
BE COUNTED
The share of S&P 500 companies making workforce data by race and
gender public rose to 82.6% as of Sept. 1 from 5.3% in 2019, according
to DiversIQ, which tracks diversity data for investors, consulting
firms and corporate clients.
Lines show % of companies publicly
disclosing data from their federal EEO-1 forms
|
The number of U.S. companies sharing environmental data, meanwhile,
has also grown, with 85% of large-cap U.S. companies disclosing
details of their greenhouse gas emissions at the end of last year, up
from 54% disclosing in 2019, according to ESG investment advisor HIP
Investor.
Chart shows the percentage of companies,
by market capitalization, disclosing details of their Scope 1 & 2
GHG emissions
|
Obtaining public disclosures on ESG data has been a
focus of pro-ESG activist investors,
including Democratic public pension officials. The disclosure uptick
also shows boards responding to new rules like the European Union's
Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, said Ken Rivlin, partner
at law firm A&O Shearman.
Many companies also made public commitments around climate, pay equity
and workforce, details they cannot easily shift with the latest news
cycle.
"Establishing corporate policy in reaction to the latest pro- or
anti-ESG news story is not a recipe for success," Rivlin said.
KEEP THE REPORTS COMING
Various conservative politicians and social media figures have
targeted companies' diversity
efforts including
their links to LGBTQ+ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign, which
surveys companies on issues including same-sex partner benefits and
transgender healthcare.
In August, home improvement retailer Lowe's, said it would no longer
participate in the survey and restructured diversity efforts. A Lowe's
representative said at the time it would continue to report workforce
diversity and pay-gap
data that
investors had asked for.
A Ford representative said via email that "we will continue to
disclose our human capital management and DEI data" in an annual
sustainability report, but did not provide further details.
Despite the departures, more than 1,400 companies participated in this
year's survey, to be released in January, up slightly from 1,384 in
the most recent survey issued in November 2023, HRC said.
Companies "know that this is what their workforce and consumers
demand," said HRC President Kelley
Robinson.
Jeremy Tedesco, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom,
which calls itself a Christian law firm and opposes many corporate ESG
efforts, said pullbacks like those by Lowe's and Ford stand in
contrast to several years ago when many companies rushed
to align with
climate and social-justice activists.
Successful lawsuits targeting
corporate diversity policies based
on the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on college
admissions could
accelerate corporate changes, Tedesco said. "Unfortunately companies
went too far and there's a lot of course-correction," he said.
ON THE BACK FOOT
Many corporate climate disclosures stem from pressure from top
fund firms backing
shareholder resolutions. Since around 2021, however, investors have cut
their support including
State Street's asset-management
arm.
Like other investors, State Street said companies have already made
significant changes. "Disclosure has dramatically improved, especially
related to E and S issues over the past five years," said Ben Colton,
State Street's stewardship chief. "I'd imagine we'll continue to see
this kind of disclosure," he said.
Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston. Additional reporting by Isla
Binnie in New York. Editing by Simon Jessop in London and Anna Driver
|
Ross
Kerber
Thomson Reuters
|
Ross Kerber is U.S. Sustainable
Business Correspondent for Reuters News, a beat he created to
cover investors’ growing concern for environmental, social and
governance (ESG) issues, and the response from executives and
policymakers. Ross joined Reuters in 2009 after a decade at
The Boston Globe and has written extensively on topics
including proxy voting by the largest asset managers, the
corporate response to social movements like Black Lives
Matter, and the backlash to ESG efforts by conservative
politicians. He writes the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance
Newsletter....
|
|