
New SEC guidance hits the Big 2,
BlackRock and Vanguard
By
Ross Kerber
February 26, 2025 2:34 PM EST
People are seen in front of a showroom
that hosts BlackRock in Davos, Switzerland Januar 22, 2020.
REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann/File Photo
|
Feb 26 (Reuters) -
New restrictions on U.S. asset managers' stewardship will fall mainly
on industry leaders BlackRock and Vanguard, a new analysis shows.
The two firms together manage nearly $22 trillion, reflecting the
success of their low-cost passive funds. But their size has brought
criticism across the political spectrum and led to various new
regulations.
On February 11, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission tightened
guidance on reporting holdings for fund managers who pressure
management on environmental, social or governance (ESG) issues. The
guidance directs them to make a more complicated disclosure document
known as a 13D filing, rather than the simple 13G.
Critics worry the changes will silence
investors' voices by discouraging them from weighing in on
questions ranging from climate change to board structure.
A review by Matt Moscardi, CEO of director analytics firm Free Float
Analytics, found that in the fourth quarter BlackRock filed 13G
disclosures for 2,363 of 4,529 publicly traded U.S. companies, and
Vanguard filed 13Gs for 2,182 of them, signs of their giant influence
across the economy.
After those two, the pace dropped far off, with Dimensional Fund
Advisors in third place having filed just 390 of the forms in the same
period.
Moscardi said the data underscores how the two firms have taken on a
massive role and can easily influence corporate elections with their
combined 10% or more of company shares.
It also means the new SEC guidance could have a big impact, even if it
mainly affects just the two firms, by dampening enthusiasm to press
for changes lest a company challenge their status as a 13G filer.
"My guess is that to not have companies challenge them, they have to
take a softer touch," Moscardi said. The firms might ask about a topic
but might not be able to press for changes such as annual board
elections, even though their voting policies suggest that.
A big question, he said, is whether a company would petition the SEC
to declare BlackRock or Vanguard an activist if either firm asks a
board about a topic, gets a dismissive answer and then votes contrary
to management's wishes.
"The companies are sitting in the drivers' seat on engagement," he
said.
Neither BlackRock nor Vanguard commented for this article.
Both companies paused their stewardship meetings with portfolio
companies while digesting the new guidance, although BlackRock said
last week it has resumed
the get-togethers. The New York firm also said "we are complying
with the new requirements including by highlighting our role as a
'passive' investor at the start of each engagement."
Ropes & Gray attorney Marc Rotter said smaller asset managers also
could still face challenges with the new guidance. It is too soon to
tell how they might respond.
"I don't think the issue is limited to the largest asset managers.
There's a greater number where the issues might be salient for a few
positions, even if they're not filing a lot" of disclosures showing
greater than 5% ownership, he said.
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
 |
Ross
Kerber
Thomson Reuters
|
Ross Kerber is U.S. Sustainable
Business Correspondent for Reuters News, a beat he created to
cover investors’ growing concern for environmental, social and
governance (ESG) issues, and the response from executives and
policymakers. Ross joined Reuters in 2009 after a decade at
The Boston Globe and has written extensively on topics
including proxy voting by the largest asset managers, the
corporate response to social movements like Black Lives
Matter, and the backlash to ESG efforts by conservative
politicians. He writes the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance
Newsletter....
|
|