Reuters, February 26, 2025, article: "New SEC guidance hits the Big 2, BlackRock and Vanguard" [Considering adaptations to new reporting rules for shareholder engagement]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Considering adaptations to new reporting rules for shareholder engagement

 

The regulatory views addressed in the article below are reported in the following SEC publication's Questions 103.11 and 103.12:

For other recent Forum attention to fund manager adaptations to responsibilities for the interests of their investors in shareholder voting, see

 

Source: Reuters, February 26, 2025, article


 

New SEC guidance hits the Big 2, BlackRock and Vanguard

By Ross Kerber

February 26, 2025 2:34 PM EST

 

 

People are seen in front of a showroom that hosts BlackRock in Davos, Switzerland Januar 22, 2020. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann/File Photo

Feb 26 (Reuters) - New restrictions on U.S. asset managers' stewardship will fall mainly on industry leaders BlackRock and Vanguard, a new analysis shows.

The two firms together manage nearly $22 trillion, reflecting the success of their low-cost passive funds. But their size has brought criticism across the political spectrum and led to various new regulations.

On February 11, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission tightened guidance on reporting holdings for fund managers who pressure management on environmental, social or governance (ESG) issues. The guidance directs them to make a more complicated disclosure document known as a 13D filing, rather than the simple 13G.

Critics worry the changes will silence investors' voices by discouraging them from weighing in on questions ranging from climate change to board structure.

A review by Matt Moscardi, CEO of director analytics firm Free Float Analytics, found that in the fourth quarter BlackRock filed 13G disclosures for 2,363 of 4,529 publicly traded U.S. companies, and Vanguard filed 13Gs for 2,182 of them, signs of their giant influence across the economy.

After those two, the pace dropped far off, with Dimensional Fund Advisors in third place having filed just 390 of the forms in the same period.

Moscardi said the data underscores how the two firms have taken on a massive role and can easily influence corporate elections with their combined 10% or more of company shares.

It also means the new SEC guidance could have a big impact, even if it mainly affects just the two firms, by dampening enthusiasm to press for changes lest a company challenge their status as a 13G filer.

"My guess is that to not have companies challenge them, they have to take a softer touch," Moscardi said. The firms might ask about a topic but might not be able to press for changes such as annual board elections, even though their voting policies suggest that.

A big question, he said, is whether a company would petition the SEC to declare BlackRock or Vanguard an activist if either firm asks a board about a topic, gets a dismissive answer and then votes contrary to management's wishes.

"The companies are sitting in the drivers' seat on engagement," he said.

Neither BlackRock nor Vanguard commented for this article.

Both companies paused their stewardship meetings with portfolio companies while digesting the new guidance, although BlackRock said last week it has resumed the get-togethers. The New York firm also said "we are complying with the new requirements including by highlighting our role as a 'passive' investor at the start of each engagement."

Ropes & Gray attorney Marc Rotter said smaller asset managers also could still face challenges with the new guidance. It is too soon to tell how they might respond.

"I don't think the issue is limited to the largest asset managers. There's a greater number where the issues might be salient for a few positions, even if they're not filing a lot" of disclosures showing greater than 5% ownership, he said.

 

Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio

Ross Kerber

Thomson Reuters

Ross Kerber is U.S. Sustainable Business Correspondent for Reuters News, a beat he created to cover investors’ growing concern for environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, and the response from executives and policymakers. Ross joined Reuters in 2009 after a decade at The Boston Globe and has written extensively on topics including proxy voting by the largest asset managers, the corporate response to social movements like Black Lives Matter, and the backlash to ESG efforts by conservative politicians. He writes the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance Newsletter....


 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.